A few people regard the authority's responsibility to handle taking of the sugar, but others suppose that it must conduct by each person. Overeating of sugar is not suitable for public health. In my opinion, it is people's mission of preserving their health. The government can put rules for companies to reduce intake, but people must make boundaries for themselves to avoid overeating sweets.
On the one hand, governmental institutions can not be the main controller to manage and organize how many candies allowed for a person to eat? Authorities and ministry of health should make penalties for companies that used a massive amount of sugar in their product. However, folks and children rushed into the desert and candy in that situation sugar will consider as a toxic use. For example, Europe since 1987 has been the most popular company for producing chocolate within every year they launch a new kind of chocolate within different flavors, but it was written on the package that terrible of overconsuming. Although the corporation warned, diabetic patients, can not minimize the eating of sweets.
On the other hand, people must have an awareness of the vulnerability problem that was appeared from overwhelming confectionery as are individual's restraint. Furthermore, parents should make a hard punishment for their children who overuse chocolate and must put a limit on that. Even though parents do restrictions, the infants escape their sweets and take it without their parents knowing. For instance, Egypt since 1985 the diabetic not only spread among old ages but also young and infants. According to, parents neglected in children's rights and delinquency for their rights.
In conclusion, overconsuming is not considered as the institution's dilemma, but the ancestors' dire need, if people restrict using sweets, it will be healthier for a human being.
A few
people
regard the authority's responsibility to handle taking of the
sugar
,
but
others suppose that it
must
conduct by each person. Overeating of
sugar
is not suitable for public health. In my opinion, it is
people
's mission of preserving their health. The
government
can put
rules
for
companies
to
reduce
intake,
but
people
must
make
boundaries for themselves to avoid overeating sweets.
On the one hand, governmental institutions can not be the main controller to manage and organize how
many
candies
allowed
for a person to eat? Authorities and ministry of health should
make
penalties for
companies
that
used
a massive amount of
sugar
in their product.
However
, folks and children rushed into the desert and candy in that situation
sugar
will consider as a toxic
use
.
For example
, Europe since 1987 has been the most popular
company
for producing chocolate within every year they launch a new kind of chocolate within
different
flavors,
but
it
was written
on the package that terrible of
overconsuming
. Although the corporation warned, diabetic patients, can not minimize the eating of sweets.
On the other hand
,
people
must
have an awareness of the vulnerability problem that
was appeared
from overwhelming confectionery as are individual's restraint.
Furthermore
,
parents
should
make
a
hard
punishment for their children who overuse chocolate and
must
put a limit on that.
Even though
parents
do restrictions, the infants escape their sweets and take it without their
parents
knowing.
For instance
, Egypt since 1985 the diabetic not
only
spread among
old
ages
but
also
young and infants. According to,
parents
neglected in children's rights and delinquency for their rights.
In conclusion
,
overconsuming
is not considered as the institution's dilemma,
but
the ancestors' dire need, if
people
restrict using sweets, it will be healthier for a human being.