In many countries, there is a huge income disparity among people. Some argued that it is for the betterment of their country, while others believe that the higher authorities should control the wages and put a fix number that people can earn. I personally do not agree with the view, because different salaries are better for the economy of the country.
To begin with, firstly, if there is a limit of up to what extent people can earn, then they will lose the motivation to do the hard work. Higher salaries encourages employees to work harder and harder to live a luxurious, so that they do not have to depend on someone in their later life. To exemplify this, if the elected political party puts some limitations on wages, then workers will not perform skilfully, because no matter how much effort they put into their work, they will be paid with same incentives, who are not working harder. Therefore, it will hurt their morale if the higher authorities are capping their wages.
On the flip side, it is irrefutable that there is a conspicuous variation among people's skills and attitudes. That is why some employees think out of the box and perform better as compare to the others. For instance, scientists who do their jobs most of the time to explore the world and finding many ways to tackle some rare diseases or seeking for new energy resources to improve quality of life. Indeed, such variable efforts towards the entire globe deserves higher salaries than other regular employee who's contribution might not help to flourish their communities as scientists do. Thus, it will lure youngsters to study more and eventually be more productive for their nations.
To sum up, capping salaries is not the solution for income disparity. Instead, government should empower the poor and provide them with financial aids so that they can study more and help them to earn good incentives for better life for themselves and their families.
In
many
countries, there is a huge income disparity among
people
.
Some
argued that it is for the betterment of their country, while others believe that the higher authorities should control the wages and put a
fix
number that
people
can earn. I
personally
do not
agree
with the view,
because
different
salaries
are better for the economy of the country.
To
begin
with,
firstly
, if there is a limit of up to what extent
people
can earn, then they will lose the motivation to do the
hard
work. Higher
salaries
encourages employees to work harder and harder to
live
a luxurious,
so
that they do not
have to
depend on someone in their later life. To exemplify this, if the elected political party puts
some
limitations on wages, then workers will not perform
skilfully
,
because
no matter how much effort they put into their work, they will
be paid
with same incentives, who are not working harder.
Therefore
, it will hurt their morale if the higher authorities are capping their wages.
On the flip side, it is irrefutable that there is a conspicuous variation among
people
's
skills
and attitudes.
That is
why
some
employees
think
out of the box and perform better as compare to the others.
For instance
, scientists who do their jobs most of the time to explore the world and finding
many
ways to tackle
some
rare diseases or seeking for new energy resources to
improve
quality of life.
Indeed
, such variable efforts towards the entire globe deserves higher
salaries
than other regular employee
who's contribution
might not
help
to flourish their communities as scientists do.
Thus
, it will lure youngsters to study more and
eventually
be more productive for their nations.
To sum up, capping
salaries
is not the solution for income disparity.
Instead
,
government
should empower the poor and provide them with financial aids
so
that they can study more and
help
them to earn
good
incentives for better life for themselves and their families.