Many aver giving detailed information about crimes committed via TV and printed media has an adverse impact on the public. Thus, this practice ought to be prohibited. I disagree with this prospect and below the reasons on which my stance is based will be discussed in details.
On the other hand, publishing detailed criminal description leads to some disadvantageous consequences. Firstly, people who routinely and regularly watch programs and read articles in magazines that are full of bloody details and horrible nuances of crimes have become accustomed to this after a while. So, violence in its many forms becomes a new norm of life. Secondly, those who were involved in the gory events such as victims, survivors and their relatives may be hurt by unwanted public attention drawn to them by the publications. For instance, TV reporters and writers often pursue those who somehow suffered from violence and illegal actions and a young victim of a rape or a father of a killed daughter will be repeatedly asked to give interviews on the painful topics. Those are main disadvantages of the discussed trend.
On the other hand, demonstration and description of crimes on the screen and paper have some positive effects. Primarily, rising people’s awareness about actions and circumstances that provoke violence may tremendously help people to avoid being involved in such horrible events. To exemplify, if people knew that robbers usually break into houses that do not have a dog in the backyard or inside the home, the informed public would likely buy a dog to deter criminals. Furthermore, the publishing detailed info about committed crimes will likely attract people’s attention to the problematic situation and this wave of discontent will probably force politicians, government officials and police officers to take some actions to tackle the problem. Thus, the number of violent crimes committed will decrease. In other words, the discussed trend has some advantageous aftermaths.
In conclusion, although a detailed description of law violations has some shortages, the merits of this practice definitely outweigh them.
Many
aver giving
detailed
information about
crimes
committed via TV and printed media has an adverse impact on the public.
Thus
, this practice ought to
be prohibited
. I disagree with this prospect and below the reasons on which my stance
is based
will
be discussed
in
details
.
On the other hand
, publishing
detailed
criminal description leads to
some
disadvantageous consequences.
Firstly
,
people
who
routinely
and
regularly
watch
programs and read articles in magazines that are full of bloody
details
and horrible nuances of
crimes
have become accustomed to this after a while.
So
, violence in its
many
forms becomes a new norm of life.
Secondly
, those who
were involved
in the gory
events
such as victims, survivors and their relatives may
be hurt
by unwanted public attention drawn to them by the publications.
For instance
, TV reporters and writers
often
pursue those who somehow suffered from violence and illegal actions and a young victim of a rape or a father of a killed daughter will be
repeatedly
asked to give interviews on the painful topics. Those are main disadvantages of the discussed trend.
On the other hand
, demonstration and description of
crimes
on the screen and paper have
some
positive
effects.
Primarily
, rising
people’s
awareness about actions and circumstances that provoke violence may
tremendously
help
people
to avoid
being involved
in such horrible
events
. To exemplify, if
people
knew that robbers
usually
break into
houses
that do not have a dog in the backyard or inside the home, the informed public would likely
buy
a dog to deter criminals.
Furthermore
, the publishing
detailed
info about committed
crimes
will likely attract
people’s
attention to the problematic situation and this wave of discontent will
probably
force politicians,
government
officials and police officers to take
some
actions to tackle the problem.
Thus
, the number of violent
crimes
committed will decrease.
In other words
, the discussed trend has
some
advantageous aftermaths.
In conclusion
, although a
detailed
description of law violations has
some
shortages, the merits of this practice definitely outweigh them.