The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. v.2

The given table compares the outcomes of surveys regarding the ratings given by students in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Overall, it can be seen that students had similar scorings for Buildings/teaching facilities, while the remaining categories witnessed mixed gradings throughout the given years. In detail, Print resources saw a gradual growth from 87% to 88% in 2010. Despite dipping a little from 2005 to 2010, the total 88% in the final year was still the joint highest with the Electronic resources (88%), as opposed to the rest. In terms of Electronic resources, there was a sharp swell from 45% in 2000, rocketing to 88% in the end of the term, nearly doubled. Likewise, Teaching quality experienced an upward trend to finish the period at 69%, but there was a minimal decline to 63% in 2005. By contrast, ' Range of modules offered' exhibited an opposite movement, which meant that there was a steady slid year on year to 27% in 2010 from the beginning 32%. Surprisingly, the ratings for Buildings/Teaching facilities held unaltered at 77% all the time in the question.