Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. v.4

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. v. 4
The table presents data regarding the poor families of different household types in Australia in 1999. Generally speaking, 11% of all Australian households lived in poverty in 1999, and among them, sole parents and singles without any child were the highest in percentages that lived in hardship. According to the given data, more than 1. 8 million families in Australia lived in economic misfortune in 1999 that formed 11% of the total households. Among them, around 50 thousand poor families came from both the single aged person and aged couple type families who formed 6% and 4% of the total of that family types. Sole parents and singles without children formed the largest percentage of poor families and their percentages were consecutively 21% and 19% of their family types. The highest percentage of poor families was from sole parents and the highest number of the needy family was from couples with children type. Comparatively, couple with no child had less poverty percentage than the single with no children family types. It is obvious that senior Austrlains suffered less from poverty than the sole parents and single persons with no child.
The table presents data regarding the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
household
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
in Australia in 1999.

Generally
speaking, 11% of all Australian households
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in poverty in 1999, and among them,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
parents
and singles without any child were the highest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in hardship.

According to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
data, more than 1. 8 million
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
in Australia
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in economic misfortune in 1999 that formed 11% of the total households. Among them, around 50 thousand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
came from both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
aged person and aged couple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
type
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
who formed 6% and 4% of the total of that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Sole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
parents
and singles without children formed the largest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
and their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
were
consecutively
21% and 19% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
. The highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
was from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
parents
and the highest number of the needy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
was from couples with children
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
type
.
Comparatively
, couple with no child had less poverty
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
with no children
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
. It is obvious that senior
Possible spelling mistake found.
Austrlains
suffered less from poverty than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sole
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
parents
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
persons with no child.
1Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
36Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. v. 4

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
190 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts