The table provided illustrates the percentage of various types of poor family living in Australia in 1999.
Overall, it is clear from the information supplied that the Australian sole parent accounted for the largest share while the aged couple was the minimum in 1999.
As can be seen from the table that in 1999 by far the greatest proportion of poor household type was the sole parent, at 21%. Following with just 2% lower was the single one with no children. Nearly less than a half as much, namely 12% came from the couple with children. The single aged person and the couple with no children accounted for virtually the same percentage, being 6% and 7% respectively. The minority of families living in poverty was the aged couple, at only 4%, and the number of all different categories of poor families was 1837000 in total, stood at 11% comparing to the whole types of households.
The table provided illustrates the percentage of various types of poor family living in Australia in 1999.
Overall
, it is
clear
from the information supplied that the Australian sole parent accounted for the largest share while the aged
couple
was the minimum in 1999.
As can be
seen
from the table that in 1999 by far the greatest proportion of poor household type was the sole parent, at 21%. Following with
just
2% lower was the single one with no children.
Nearly
less than a half as much,
namely
12% came from the
couple
with children. The single aged person and the
couple
with no children accounted for
virtually
the same percentage, being 6% and 7%
respectively
. The minority of families living in poverty was the aged
couple
, at
only
4%, and the number of all
different
categories of poor families was 1837000 in total, stood at 11% comparing to the whole types of households.
2Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
4Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes