Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. v.2

The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. v. 2
The given pie charts illustrate the number of factors which are used to make electricity generation during the period between 1990 and 2010 in both New Zealand and Germany. Overall, it is evident that the main source using mostly was coal except the case of Germany in 2010. It is clear that the total units of source in Germany was the highest by 214 units. Firstly, in New Zealand, the number of coal units rose dramatically from 56 in 1980 to 120 in 2010, followed by hydro units in 2010 with roughly 16. On the other hand, there was a sudden decline in the number of natural gas units from 30 in 1980 to 2 in 2010. At the same time, the proportion of petroleum units fell steeply by 9 in 2010. Besides, in Germany, the number of nuclear units is appeared, there was a sharp growth from 20 in 1980 to 155 in 2010. The proportion of coal units still stood at 28 through years. At the other extreme, there was a slight drop in the number of petroleum from 22 in 1980 to 27 in 2010. Similarly, the figure of natural gas went down enormously from 28 in 1980 to 2 in 2010, followed by hydro units with approximately 5 in 2010.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
pie charts illustrate the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of factors which are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
electricity generation during the period between 1990 and 2010 in both New Zealand and Germany.

Overall
, it is evident that the main source using
mostly
was coal except the case of Germany in 2010. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of source in Germany was the highest by 214 units.

Firstly
, in New Zealand, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
rose
dramatically
from 56 in 1980 to 120 in 2010, followed by hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2010 with roughly 16.
On the other hand
, there was a sudden decline in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of natural gas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
from 30 in 1980 to 2 in 2010. At the same time, the proportion of petroleum
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
fell
steeply
by 9 in 2010.

Besides
, in Germany, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
is appeared
, there was a sharp growth from 20 in 1980 to 155 in 2010. The proportion of coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
still
stood at 28 through years. At the other extreme, there was a slight drop in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of petroleum from 22 in 1980 to 27 in 2010.
Similarly
, the figure of natural gas went down
enormously
from 28 in 1980 to 2 in 2010, followed by hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
with approximately 5 in 2010.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
13Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS academic The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
214 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts