Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. v.2

The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. v. 2
The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly domestic cost allotted for 7 categories, namely: food and drinks, fuel bill, clothing, transport, miscellaneous, restaurant and hotel and lastly, recreational and cultural activities. The first chart illustrates the expenditures of the low-income group and the second pie chart shows how the high-income group spent their income. Both charts pertained to one of the countries in Europe. It is evident that the low-income group spent the largest proportion of their income on food and drinks while the high-income group allotted the majority of their salary for miscellaneous items. Meanwhile, the tiniest percentage of expenditure for lesser income group was for the restaurant and hotel while for the higher income group, this was for clothing. In detail, poor people prioritised food and drinks and this item demanded 29% of their wages unlike with rich persons, as it was only on their 4th priority with only 15%. Surprisingly, the low-income group spent more on fuel bill compared to the high-income group with 24% and 7% respectively. However, in the remaining categories, rich people had higher expenditures. For instance, rich individuals spent 21% of their wages on recreational and cultural activities while poor individuals allotted only 11% for this category. Interestingly, the high-income group spent an enormous proportion of the miscellaneous category (23%) while the low-income group allotted only 18%. Also, rich individuals spent more on transportation (16%) than poor people (9%). Similarly, both categories have less than 10% spent on clothing.
The pie
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charts
compare the proportion of monthly domestic cost
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
allotted
for 7
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
categories
,
namely
: food and drinks, fuel bill, clothing, transport, miscellaneous, restaurant and hotel and
lastly
, recreational and cultural activities. The
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chart
illustrates the expenditures of the low-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
and the second pie
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
chart
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
how the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
. Both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charts
pertained to one of the countries in Europe.

It is evident that the low-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
the largest proportion of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
on food and drinks while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
allotted
the majority of their salary for miscellaneous items. Meanwhile, the tiniest percentage of expenditure for lesser
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
was for the restaurant and hotel while for the higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
, this was for clothing.

In detail, poor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
Possible spelling mistake. 'prioritised' is British English.
prioritised
food and drinks and this item demanded 29% of their wages unlike with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rich
persons, as it was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
on their 4th priority with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
15%.
Surprisingly
, the low-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
more on fuel bill compared to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
with 24% and 7%
respectively
.
However
, in the remaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
categories
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rich
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
had higher expenditures.
For instance
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rich
individuals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
21% of their wages on recreational and cultural activities while poor individuals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
allotted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
11% for this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
.
Interestingly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
high-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
an enormous proportion of the miscellaneous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
(23%) while the low-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
allotted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
18%.
Also
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rich
individuals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
more on transportation (16%) than poor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
(9%).
Similarly
, both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
categories
have less than 10%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
on clothing.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
46Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. v. 2

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
247 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts