Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000 v.2

The chart shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000 v. 2
The bar chart illustrates the quantity of energy generated from the wind of four nations between 1985 and 2000. The data calibrated is in megawatts. Overall, it can be clearly seen that all countries amount of energy from wind had increased except the US in the last given year, although the US was the leader of generating energy among all three nations. Firstly in 1980 and 1990 India and Canada constructed a less energy as compare to other two countries, which was nearby 200 and 300 MW, but the quantity of energy production from wind India and Canada had experienced a rise of 800 and 1600 MW in 1995 and 2000, though it was not higher than the US contribution of energy from wind. Secondly, the energy generated from the wind by Germany experienced a twofold increase in 1990, but after Canada surpassed the way which Germany producing the energy at the end of the period. Apparently, the US mentioned its increasing performance until 1995 nearby 1200, 1630 and 1600 MW but in 2000 Canada beaten the performance of the US by the difference of 1050 MW in making energy from the wind.
The bar chart illustrates the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
of four nations between 1985 and 2000. The data calibrated is in megawatts.

Overall
, it can be
clearly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that all countries amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
had increased except the US in the last
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
year, although the US was the leader of generating
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
among all three nations.

Firstly
in 1980 and 1990 India and Canada constructed a less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
as compare to other two countries, which was nearby 200 and 300 MW,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
India and Canada had experienced a rise of 800 and 1600 MW in 1995 and 2000, though it was not higher than the US contribution of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from wind.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
by Germany experienced a twofold increase in 1990,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after Canada surpassed the way which Germany producing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the period.
Apparently
, the US mentioned its increasing performance until 1995 nearby 1200, 1630 and 1600 MW
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in 2000 Canada beaten the performance of the US by the difference of 1050 MW in making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wind
.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes
Learn everything you can, anytime you can, from anyone you can; there will always come a time when you will be grateful you did.
Sarah Caldwell

IELTS academic The chart shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000 v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
193 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts