Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v.1

The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money which was given for aid from the US, Germany, the UK, Japan, Netherland, and Sweden to developing countries between 2008 and 2010. Units are measured in billions of dollars. In 2008, the US and Germany spent about 22 billion dollars and 10 billion dollars respectively. The amount which was accounted for the UK and Japan were around 12 billion dollars each, and for Netherland and Sweden, it was around 8 billion dollars for each. In 2009, the US reduced its amount for aid, which was 2 billion dollars. Similarly, the UK and Japan also decreased their budget, and this amount stood at roughly 11 billion and 10 billion dollars respectively. On the other hand, Germany, Netherland and Sweden increased their spending amount to approximately 13 billion, 8 billion and 7 billion dollars. In 2009, while all the countries rose their budget, Sweden declined their annual amount for aid to developing countries.
The bar chart illustrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of money which was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
for aid from the US, Germany, the UK, Japan,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
, and Sweden to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developing countries
between 2008 and 2010. Units
are measured
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billions
of dollars.

In 2008, the US and Germany spent about 22
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
and 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
respectively
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
which
was accounted
for the UK and Japan were around 12
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
each, and for
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
and Sweden, it was around 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
for each.

In 2009, the US
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
for aid, which was 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
.
Similarly
, the UK and Japan
also
decreased their budget, and this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
stood at roughly 11
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
and 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dollars
respectively
.
On the other hand
, Germany,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
and Sweden increased their spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
to approximately 13
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
, 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
and 7
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
billion
dollars.

In 2009, while all the countries rose their budget, Sweden declined their annual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
for aid to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developing countries
.
3Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes
Change your language and you change your thoughts.
Karl Albrecht

IELTS academic The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
159 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts