It is irrefutable that nowadays there is a tendency of shifting to big cities with the purpose of settling down and start a new job. These cities, which are the most hunted for this purposes, are mainly comprised of multistorey buildings and I agree, whereas horizontal cities are left behind, in terms of people' s preferences. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints about the matter before putting forth my opinion.
On the one hand, there are countless benefits of being employed and living in a vertical city. Firstly, you have the opportunity to work in a corporation which is more likely to be located in a skyscraper rather than in a small building, as compared to a horizontal city. Take the example of Sony Company' headquarter in Singapore, which is a metropolitan city and where virtually all large companies are located within tall establishments. Furthermore, there is a higher likelihood for one to find accommodation in a multistorey building, which is most definitely state-of-the-art and has incorporated the latest technology, providing one with a better standard of living.
On the other hand, a sizeable number of such tall establishments gathered in a city means a higher density population which leads to overcrowding, in comparison with just a few spreaded within a horizontal city. In other words, the city would deal with a burgeoning population and its detrimental effects on citizens' physical and mental health. For instance, residents will have to deal with traffic congestion and increased pollution, which will most definitely have some dire consequences for their wellbeing.
To conclude, although there are merits and demerits of living in a vertical city, I strongly opine that the drawbacks are far fewer than the benefits you can get, namely having a better quality of life and a well-paid job in a multinational corporation.
It is irrefutable that nowadays there is a tendency of shifting to
big
cities
with the purpose of settling down and
start
a new job. These
cities
, which are the most hunted for
this
purposes, are
mainly comprised of
multistorey
buildings and I
agree
, whereas horizontal
cities
are
left
behind, in terms of
people&
#039; s preferences. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints about the matter
before
putting forth my opinion.
On the one hand, there are countless benefits of
being employed
and living in a vertical city.
Firstly
, you have the opportunity to work in a corporation which is more likely to
be located
in a skyscraper
rather
than in a
small
building, as compared to a horizontal city. Take the example of Sony
Company&
#039; headquarter in Singapore, which is a metropolitan city and where
virtually
all large
companies
are located
within tall establishments.
Furthermore
, there is a higher likelihood for one to find accommodation in a
multistorey
building, which is most definitely state-of-the-art and has incorporated the latest technology, providing one with a better standard of living.
On the other hand
, a sizeable number of such tall establishments gathered in a city means a higher density population which leads to overcrowding,
in comparison
with
just
a few
spreaded
within a horizontal city.
In other words
, the city would deal with a burgeoning population and its detrimental effects on
citizens&
#039; physical and mental health.
For instance
, residents will
have to
deal with traffic congestion and increased pollution, which will most definitely have
some
dire consequences for their
wellbeing
.
To conclude
, although there are merits and demerits of living in a vertical city, I
strongly
opine that the drawbacks are far fewer than the benefits you can
get
,
namely
having a better quality of life and a well-paid job in a multinational corporation.