Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that economic growth of any country reduces poverty and hunger while other think that it causes damage to the environment. Discuss both the views and give your opinion v.2

Some people believe that economic growth of any country reduces poverty and hunger while other think that it causes damage to the environment. 2
With the steady growth in modernisation, The lifestyle of people have been greatly affected. They have achieved various milestones. However, some issues remain unchallenged and as complex as ever. One such issue here is that economic development. This particular topic asserts that economic growth: should it is responsible for reduction in poverty and hunger or vandalism to eco system? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimesions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end. On one side, there is group of people who believe that economic development reduces poverty and hunger. In this present era, poverty and hunger is the “burning question of the day”. They strengthen their view point by claiming that there is rapid flourishment in the industry sector. Due to this, new industries are open. The industries require more and more labour. With the help of this, each and every individual work which helps them to handle the budget of thier family. The outcome is that, it become very beneficial to reduce the issue of poverty and hunger. The best epitome is that, there is a survey counducted by hindustan times in which they said that in the developed countries; industries are open on a large scale which helps them to minimize the poverty and hunger as compare to undeveloped countries. On the flip side, there are antagonists to this assertions who believe that economic growth harm to the environment. They bolster their view point they claim that there is a advancemt in agriculture sector. The large amount of pesticides and insectides are use to get best crop. Well, these chemicals assist to improve the yield of crop and helps to reduce hunger and poverty but, no doubt; they depletion the abiotic sector such as water bodies and soil by polluting them which are the “part and parcel” of human life. Zimbabwe would be the perfect example of this. There is a survey conducted by environment department and they find out that in zimbabwe they take lots of step to minimize their poverty and hunger but, the outcome is that they had been unbalance the environment. To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing both the option; I believe that there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands so i think poverty and hunger should be reduce but without any distrubance in the environment.
With the steady growth in
modernisation
, The lifestyle of
people
have been
greatly
affected
. They have achieved various milestones.
However
,
some
issues remain unchallenged and as complex as ever. One such issue here is that
economic
development. This particular topic asserts that
economic
growth: should it is responsible for reduction in
poverty
and
hunger
or vandalism to
eco system
? Through this essay, I shall explore the
dimesions
of this topic and shape up my opinion by the
end
.

On one side, there is group of
people
who believe that
economic
development
reduces
poverty
and
hunger
. In this present era,
poverty
and
hunger
is the “burning question of the day”. They strengthen their view point by claiming that there is rapid
flourishment
in the
industry
sector. Due to this, new
industries
are open. The
industries
require more and more
labour
. With the
help
of this, each and every individual work which
helps
them to handle the budget of
thier
family. The outcome is that, it
become
very
beneficial to
reduce
the issue of
poverty
and
hunger
. The best epitome is that, there is a survey
counducted
by
hindustan
times in which they said that in the
developed countries
;
industries
are open on a large scale which
helps
them to minimize the
poverty
and
hunger
as compare to undeveloped countries.

On the flip side, there are antagonists to
this
assertions who believe that
economic
growth harm to the environment. They bolster their view point they claim that there is
a
advancemt
in agriculture sector. The large amount of pesticides and
insectides
are
use to
get
best crop. Well, these chemicals assist to
improve
the yield of crop and
helps
to
reduce
hunger
and
poverty
but
, no doubt;
they depletion
the abiotic sector such as water bodies and soil by polluting them which are the “part and parcel” of human life. Zimbabwe would be the perfect example of this. There is a survey conducted by environment
department and
they find out that in
zimbabwe
they take
lots of step
to minimize their
poverty
and
hunger
but
, the outcome is that they had been unbalance the environment.

To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing both the option; I believe that there is no single conclusion
still
; I take this ground that an effective clap requires both
use
of hands
so
i
think
poverty
and
hunger
should be
reduce
but
without any
distrubance
in the environment.
2Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
21Mistakes
Language is not a genetic gift, it is a social gift. Learning a new language is becoming a member of the club – the community of speakers of that language.
Frank Smith

IELTS academic Some people believe that economic growth of any country reduces poverty and hunger while other think that it causes damage to the environment. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
404 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts