Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper."The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at

The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper. " The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at bYO5Q
The city government proposes to let only the residents become the member on the committee that advises government on the usage of budget. While the government provides two reasons why it could be able to make the Oak City better place by allowing only residents become the member of committee, all these reasons are dubious. It is not known how many member on the commitee are non-resident members? and whether their objections were reasonable or foolish? If there were significant number of resident member on the committe and government still failed to convince the committee then removing non-resident member from the committe will not make the Oak City a better place to live. Secondly, the local government cites that non-resident member work in the city but live somewhere else hence, they do not understand the politics and government of the city. Since non-resident members of the committee work in the city, there is greater chance that they are as aware as any other resident of the city about the politics. They could have learned about the working and politics of the city either directly or from some other sources. It might be that they have friend who happens to be resident member of the society and non member keep themselves abreast of current affairs in the city by discussing with resident member of the society. Since the claims of the local government are apocryphal, removing non-resident member on the committee is unlikely to make the Oak City a better place to live. Thirdly, the local government cites resident of city paying taxes as evidence of their awareness of politics of the city. However, it is not known whether resident of the city are really aware the politics of the city. In case, it is proven that the residents are not aware about the current affairs of city, the governments recommendation is unlikely ot have the predicted result. Finally, it is unclear what are the motives of government behind asking people to let the only residents become member of the society. If only residents become the member on the committee, there is high probability that favuratism will be rife in the government and in turn would lead to waxing of the corruption and squandering of the valuable resources. This is antithetical to what the government proposes to do after electing only residents as the member of the society. The government's recommendation could be corroborated by disclosing the facts and not percieved deficiency of non-resident members, and by revealing whether the large number of resident member were in opposition to the government or not. In conclusion, since the government motives are unclear, the number of non-resident member already present on the committtee and whether the objection raised by committee were rfooloish or no is unknown, the city government's recommendation will not make the Oak City a better place to live.
The city
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
proposes to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
become
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
that advises
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
on the usage of budget. While the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
provides two reasons why it could be able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the Oak City
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
by allowing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
become
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
, all these reasons are dubious. It is not known how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
on the
Possible spelling mistake found.
commitee
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
?
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
and
whether their objections were reasonable or foolish? If there were significant number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
on the
Possible spelling mistake found.
committe
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
still
failed to convince the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
then removing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
from the
Possible spelling mistake found.
committe
will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the Oak City a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.

Secondly
, the local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
cites that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
work in the city
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
somewhere else
hence
, they do not understand the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politics
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
of the city. Since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
work in the city, there is greater chance that they are as aware as any other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
of the city about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politics
. They could have learned about the working and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politics
of the city either
directly
or from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
other sources. It might be that they have friend who happens to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of the society and non
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
themselves abreast of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
affairs in the city by discussing with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of the society. Since the claims of the local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
are apocryphal, removing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
is unlikely to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the Oak City a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.

Thirdly
, the local
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
cites
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
of city paying taxes as evidence of their awareness of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politics
of the city.
However
, it is not known whether
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
of the city are
really
aware the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politics
of the city. In case, it
is proven
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
are not aware about the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
affairs of city, the
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "governments'" or "government's"?
governments
recommendation is unlikely
Possible spelling mistake found.
ot
have the predicted result.

Finally
, it is unclear what are the motives of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
behind asking
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
become
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of the society. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
become
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
, there is high probability that
Possible spelling mistake found.
favuratism
will be rife in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and in turn would lead to waxing of the corruption and squandering of the valuable resources. This is antithetical to what the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
proposes to do after electing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
residents
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
of the society.

The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
's recommendation could
be corroborated
by disclosing the facts and not
Possible spelling mistake found.
percieved
deficiency of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
members
, and by revealing whether the large number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
were in opposition to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
or not.

In conclusion
, since the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
motives are unclear, the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
non-resident
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
member
already present on the
Possible spelling mistake found.
committtee
and whether the objection raised by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
committee
were
Possible spelling mistake found.
rfooloish
or
Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
no
is unknown, the city
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
's recommendation will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the Oak City a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
place
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper. " The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at

Letter
  American English
6 paragraphs
478 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper."The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at