Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper."In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearvie

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper. " In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearvie GMWmQ
In the letter, the author recommends that local residents should vote for Ann Green, and then the environment in Clearview will be better than before. To support the recommendation, the author cites some examples and tries to persuade us recognize the argument. However, those examples seem at first glance convincing, a close inspection reveals that this recommendation is filled with unwarranted assumptions, which makes us question his motivation. To begin with, the author fails to provide any strong evidence to prove that Ann Green is more qualified than Frank Braun as a mayor. First, the fact that Ann Green is the member of the Good Earth Coalition does not directly indicate that she is capable of dealing with environmental problems. Perhaps she just specializes in management of employees and does not have any practical problem-solving skills. Reversely, although Frank Braun is from the Clearview town council, he might has a consolidate knowledge foundation in earth, nature and environment protection. The author does not mention any education background of each candidate. Without ruling out these possibilities, the recommendation remains dubious as best. Secondly, the author fails to take into considerations other factor that strongly affects the environment in town. For example, more and more residents purchase private cars and do not choose public transportation to commute from home to working place. Gas emission from those automobiles plays a major part in air pollution. Or perhaps, there are less and less green plants and trees in the town due to some profitable reasons, such as making much more paper and books or building some luxury furniture, which will intensify the air pollution issue. As a result, the environment will be worsen. Every one needs to be aware of this importance of protection. Thirdly, the author belittles the fact that the increasing number of factories will decrease unemployment rate. As a mayor, you not only care about the environment of the town, but also need to consider that people need to making a living and get a job for supporting their families. However, if local people cannot even earn a salary, the economy of the town definitely is very gloomy. Thus, no money will be spent on protection and people will be starving and poor. I bet that no mayors want this result. All in all, every citizen is responsible for the future of their hometown and city. The prosperity of city depends on every citizen's contribution. However, whoever will take this position of being a mayor of Clearview, she or he needs make a huge effort in reconstructing the city and rebuilding a better life for citizens. Without making these determinations, the recommendation remains untenable as it stands.
In the letter, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
recommends that local residents should vote for Ann
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Green
, and then the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Clearview
will be better than
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
. To support the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recommendation
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
cites
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
examples and tries to persuade us recognize the argument.
However
, those examples seem at
first
glance convincing, a close inspection reveals that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recommendation
is filled
with unwarranted assumptions, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
us question his motivation.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
fails to provide any strong evidence to prove that Ann
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Green
is more qualified than Frank Braun as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mayor
.
First
, the fact that Ann
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Green
is the member of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Good
Earth Coalition does not
directly
indicate that she is capable of dealing with environmental problems. Perhaps she
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
specializes in management of employees and does not have any practical problem-solving
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
.
Reversely
, although Frank Braun is from the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Clearview
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
council, he might
The verb 'might' requires the base form of the verb: "have"
has
After 'a', do not use a verb. Make sure that the spelling of 'consolidate' is correct. If 'consolidate' is the first word in a compound adjective, use a hyphen between the two words. Note: This error message can occur if you use a verb as a noun, and the word is not a noun in standard English.
a consolidate
knowledge foundation in earth, nature and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
protection. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
does not mention any education background of each candidate. Without ruling out these possibilities, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recommendation
remains dubious as best.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
fails to take into considerations other factor that
strongly
affects the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
.
For example
, more and more residents
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
private cars and do not choose public transportation to commute from home to working place. Gas emission from those automobiles plays a major part in air pollution. Or perhaps, there are less and less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
green
plants and trees in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
due to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
profitable reasons, such as making much more paper and books or building
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
luxury furniture, which will intensify the air pollution issue.
As a result
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
will be
Consider using the past participle "worsened"?
worsen
. Every one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
to be aware of this importance of protection.

Thirdly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
belittles the fact that the increasing number of factories will decrease unemployment rate. As a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mayor
, you not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
care about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
to consider that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
to making a living and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a job for supporting their families.
However
, if local
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
cannot even earn a salary, the economy of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
definitely is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
gloomy.
Thus
, no money will
be spent
on protection and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will be starving and poor. I bet that no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mayors
want this result.

All in all, every citizen is responsible for the future of their hometown and city. The prosperity of city depends on every citizen's contribution.
However
, whoever will take this position of being a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mayor
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
Clearview
, she or he
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a huge effort in reconstructing the city and rebuilding a better life for citizens. Without making these determinations, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recommendation
remains untenable as it stands.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper. " In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearvie

Letter
  American English
5 paragraphs
446 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper."In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearvie