In this editorial the author concludes that hearing books on tape would encourage the students to read books and learn more eagerly. To justify this conclusion he points out that books recorded on audiocassette tape can be an important alternative for students who are tired of the only reading activity. He also cites that many studies have emphasized on allowing students to hear books read aloud. A careful scrutiny to the evidence reveals that it lends little credence to this argument.
First, the author unfairly assumes that the students discouraged by lonely reading activity will show enthusiasm towards hearing the audio versions. They might be displeased by hearing too since they are not interested in the subjects and contents of the books, or they might seem eager at first but lose their attention and desire in long term. Without considering and ruling out these and other possibilities the author cannot substantially conclude that the audio versions would be highly beneficial.
Second, even assuming that the students remain enthusiastic in long term it does not guarantee their eager and progress in learning. Their eagerness might be merely because of considering the activity of hearing as an entertainment rather that learning their lessons and they may pay no deep attention to the content of the audio books. Therefore the author conclusion about the students’ more eager learning would be specious.
Third, the author provides no evidence that the results of the studies are statistically reliable. In order to achieve a strong conclusion, the studies’ sample must be sufficient in size and representative of the overall population of the student discouraged by merely reading. Lacking evidence of a sufficiently representative sample the author cannot justifiably rely on the studies to draw any conclusion.
In sum, the author fails to convince me. To bolster this conclusion, he must account for other possible factors in discouraging the students and provide information about their long term reading and learning improvements after being exposed to hearing the audio books. To better assess the strength of the argument the author must assures me that the studies’ results accurately reflect the characteristic and learning habits of the whole students.
In this editorial the
author
concludes that hearing
books
on tape would encourage the
students
to read
books
and learn more
eagerly
. To justify this
conclusion
he points out that
books
recorded on
audiocassette
tape can be an
important
alternative for
students
who
are tired
of the
only
reading
activity. He
also
cites that
many
studies
have emphasized on allowing
students
to hear
books
read aloud. A careful scrutiny to the evidence reveals that it lends
little
credence to this argument.
First
, the
author
unfairly
assumes that the
students
discouraged by lonely
reading
activity will
show
enthusiasm towards hearing the audio versions. They might
be displeased
by hearing too since they are not interested in the subjects and contents of the
books
, or they might seem eager at
first
but
lose their attention and desire in long term. Without considering and ruling out these and other possibilities the
author
cannot
substantially
conclude that the audio versions would be
highly
beneficial.
Second, even assuming that the
students
remain enthusiastic in long term it does not guarantee their eager and progress in
learning
. Their eagerness might be
merely
because
of considering the activity of hearing as an entertainment
rather
that
learning
their
lessons and
they may pay no deep attention to the content of the audio
books
.
Therefore
the
author
conclusion
about the
students’
more eager
learning
would be specious.
Third, the
author
provides no evidence that the results of the
studies
are
statistically
reliable. In order to achieve a strong
conclusion
, the
studies’
sample
must
be
sufficient in size
and representative of the
overall
population of the
student
discouraged by
merely
reading
. Lacking evidence of a
sufficiently
representative sample the
author
cannot
justifiably
rely on the
studies
to draw any conclusion.
In sum, the
author
fails to convince me. To bolster this
conclusion
, he
must
account for other possible factors in discouraging the
students
and provide information about their long term
reading
and
learning
improvements after
being exposed
to hearing the audio
books
. To better assess the strength of the argument the
author
must
assures
me that the
studies’
results
accurately
reflect the characteristic and
learning
habits of the whole
students
.