According to the argument appeared inthe newsletter of GoldenAge Independent and Assited Living Facilities for Seniors, author introduces us with the novel therapy for the prevention or delay of dementia. It was stated that a study of 21-year at Albert Einstein college of Medicine and funded by the National Institute on Ageing that frequent dancing offered the best protection against dementia. Thus author recommends to establish the socisl dance programs at all Goldenage senior residences. This arguments has many holes and assumptions which makes it a failure to expatiate its opinion.
First and foremost assumption that social dancing will prevent the onset of dementia. This is totally wrong statement. Though the study was held for 21-year, but how can one rely on that report when it lacks the statistics and evidences for that research? When was the study exactly been done? It may happen that within 21 years this report are done much earlier and now the senerio can change. In the research it surly have use some technique by which the examined that physical activities other that frequent dancing are benefitting the cardiovascular diseases. Hence the argument need the evidences to bolster the assumption and statement.
Secondly, social dancing is the activity which mostly left for the young generation and here the report says that seniors should get involve in such activity. Isn't it difficult to make up their mind for this? Then question arises how would they support the social programmes? Would it be possible that they would not move their recidence from independent living appartment to the expensive operated assited living quarters?
Finally, we should also let them to get involve in our discussion on prevention of dementia. Possibly we make get to know what exactly they need.
Thus argument
According to the
argument
appeared
inthe
newsletter of
GoldenAge
Independent and
Assited
Living Facilities for Seniors, author introduces us with the novel therapy for the prevention or delay of
dementia
. It
was stated
that a study of 21-year at Albert Einstein college of Medicine and funded by the National Institute on
Ageing
that frequent
dancing
offered the best protection against
dementia
.
Thus
author
recommends to establish
the
socisl
dance programs at all
Goldenage
senior residences.
This
arguments
has
many
holes and assumptions which
makes
it a failure to expatiate its opinion.
First
and foremost assumption that social
dancing
will
prevent
the onset of
dementia
. This is
totally
wrong
statement. Though the study
was held
for 21-year,
but
how can one rely on that report when it lacks the statistics and evidences for that research? When was the study exactly
been done
? It may happen that within 21 years this report
are done
much earlier and
now
the
senerio
can
change
. In the research it surly
have
use
some
technique by which the examined that physical activities other that frequent
dancing
are
benefitting
the cardiovascular diseases.
Hence
the
argument
need the evidences to bolster the assumption and statement.
Secondly
, social
dancing
is the activity which
mostly
left
for the young generation and here the report says that seniors should
get
involve in such activity. Isn't it difficult to
make
up their mind for this? Then question arises how would they support the social
programmes
? Would it be possible that they would not
move
their
recidence
from independent living
appartment
to the expensive operated
assited
living quarters?
Finally
, we should
also
let
them to
get
involve in our discussion on prevention of
dementia
.
Possibly
we
make
get
to know what exactly they need.
Thus
argument