Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove town newspaper."Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove town newspaper. " Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to AjQXn
The author of this argument asserts that the decision of Walnut Grone's town council in replacing the EZ Disposal with ABC Waste, two trash collectors, is mistaken. To support his claim the author cites that although the the ABS's fee is $500 less than the EZ Disposal's fee, the EZ Disposal collects twice per week, and ABS Waste does it once. The article also cites that they both have same numbers of trucks, 20 trucks. To strengthen his claim the article mentions that a survey done in the recent years shows that 80%respondents are satisfied by the service of the EZ Disposal. The reasoning rest on a series of unconvincing assumptions, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. The author bases his claim partly on the fact that the EZ Disposal works twice as much as the ABC does. However, the author ignores the reality that the number of collecting trash is not the main factor to judge these companies. In fact, what we should notice and make decision based on about these companies is quality of their work. It is possible that the council of this town has observed the better performance of the ABC Waste during once collection of trash. Lacking evidence to disclose the quality of both cases, I cannot express my compliance to the what the author urge on it in his mind. In further support of this assertion, the article points out that since the both companies have same numbers of trucks, no one can do more. But, the number of the track is not the main factor for the trucks. What we should consider in order to evaluate these vehicles is their facilities and quality of their truck. Perhaps, ABC Waste' trucks have better facilities. Or perhaps, they are newer ones and produce less pollution in comparison to EZ Disposal' trucks, since pollution itself may be a problem in this town. Without ruling out such alternative explanations for trucks and their roles on judging the quality of these companies, the author cannot defend his reasoning that EZ Disposal is better. For additional support, the excerpt's author is of the opinion that referring to a survey, declaring that majority of citizens would express their confidence and tendency on the services provided by EZ Disposal, is what we are able to rely on to make decision about service of this company. Nevertheless, the memo has overlooked to provides information about numbers of participants in this survey. It is critical since ten or twenty persons cannot reflect the whole town's opinion about it. Besides, it is possible that these people are not familiar with other companies' services and quality that work on this area. Under such condition, they are agree with little work done at this area. Nor has compelling evidence provided about this point. So the author cannot rely on this survey to convince readers that EZ Disposal is what we should trust for collecting trash. Finally, the author implies that $500 fee is not so much to switch from one company to another. However, we should be aware that in years this money can be very much. so if controlled very well, it can play positive role in many areas in the town like providing fund for making greener town. In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to his claim. To persuade me that this recommendation is correct the author must specify clear information about both companies' quality of work. We would also need determined information about trucks not just number of them. The author would need consider cogent evidence about the numbers of respondents.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
of this argument asserts that the decision of Walnut
Possible spelling mistake found.
Grone
's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
council in replacing the EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ABC
Waste, two trash collectors,
is mistaken
. To
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
support
his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
cites that although
Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only "the" or "the" is left.
the the
ABS's fee is $500 less than the EZ Disposal's fee, the EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
collects twice per week, and ABS Waste does it once. The article
also
cites that they both have same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
, 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
. To strengthen his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
the article mentions that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
survey
done in the recent years
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that 80%respondents
are satisfied
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
service
of the EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
. The reasoning rest on a series of unconvincing assumptions, and is
therefore
unpersuasive as it stands.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
bases his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
partly on the fact that the EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
works twice as much as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ABC
does.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignores
the reality that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of collecting trash is not the main factor to judge these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
. In fact, what we should notice and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
decision based on about these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
. It is possible that the council of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
has observed the better performance of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ABC
Waste during once collection of trash. Lacking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidence
to disclose the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of both cases, I cannot express my compliance to the what the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
urge on it in his mind.

In
further
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
support
of this assertion, the article points out that since the both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
have same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
, no one can do more.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
track
is not the main factor for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
. What we should consider in order to evaluate these vehicles is their facilities and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
truck
. Perhaps,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ABC
Waste'
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
have better facilities. Or perhaps, they are newer ones and produce less pollution
in comparison
to EZ Disposal'
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
, since pollution itself may be a problem in this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
. Without ruling out such alternative explanations for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
and their roles on judging the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
cannot defend his reasoning that EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
is better.

For additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
support
, the excerpt's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
is of the opinion that referring to a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
survey
, declaring that majority of citizens would express their confidence and tendency on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
services
provided by EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
, is what we are able to rely on to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
decision about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
service
of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
.
Nevertheless
, the memo has overlooked to
The verb after "to" should be in the base form: "provide".
provides
information about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of participants in this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
survey
. It is critical since ten or twenty persons cannot reflect the whole town's opinion about it.
Besides
, it is possible that these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are not familiar with other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
'
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
services
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on this area. Under such condition, they are
Consider using a past participle here: "agreed".
agree
with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
done at this area. Nor has compelling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidence
provided about this point.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
cannot rely on this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
survey
to convince readers that EZ
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Disposal
is what we should trust for collecting trash.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
implies that $500 fee is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
much to switch from one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
to another.
However
, we should be aware that in years this money can be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
much.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
so
if controlled
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
well, it can play
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
role in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
areas in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
town
like providing fund for making greener town.

In conclusion
, the author's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidence
lends
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
credible
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
support
to his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
. To persuade me that this recommendation is correct the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
specify
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
information about both
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
'
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
. We would
also
need determined information about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trucks
not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
of them. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
would need consider cogent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
evidence
about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of respondents.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove town newspaper. " Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to

Letter
  American English
6 paragraphs
602 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove town newspaper."Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal (which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove for the past ten years) to