Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown: “If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passe

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown: “If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passe AjaW3
The author of the letter presents a case for encouraging the residents of Masontown to recycle enough through an advertising campaign. The argument is not cogent enough and is full of holes. There are many questions that need to be answered before coming to any sort of conclusion. Citing the municipal garbage disposal fees as the main reason for encouraging the residents of Masontown, the author assumes that majority of the garbage contains products which can be recycled. That is, there is an appreciable amount of recyclable garbage for the town to reduce its municipal costs. No evidence or support is provided for this. So, what is the proportion of garbage that is recyclable in this town? To know this a survey has to be conducted to assess the reality of the situation in Masontown. It might be the case that there is not enough amount of recyclable garbage and the system or recommendation will fail to work if it is the case. Additionally, the author assumes that the type of garbage present in Haynesworth is similar to Masontown for the recommendation to work. Is the garbage in Masontown similar to that of in Haynesworth? It sure can be the case that Masontown produces a different type of recyclable waste such as metals. The recommendation may not work here because even though the people of Masontown recycle their product, it will not have any effect on the municipal garbage disposal fees as the metals were never part of the garbage in first place. Maybe people were selling the metal to some shops that used to recycle them before and will continue to do the same afterwards too. This makes the recommendation unwarranted. Building upon that, the author clearly misses a huge point or he simply assumes that there will be a system in place for recycling the waste. How will the residents recycle the waste products? Is there any system already in place for that? If not how much will it cost to build such a system? Recycling the waste is not a simple process, it requires a certain system that ensures that the garbage is collected on time and delivered to the factory or any similar place. To develop or maintain such a system there are many costs involved. Like paying the person who collects the recyclable waste from house to house. These must be taken into account before going for the advertising campaign. Lastly, the author implies that the residents of Masontown will be motivated enough to recycle the garbage just by the advertising campaign. The same might have worked in Haynesworth but that does not mean it will work here. The reason it might have worked in Haynesworth might be due to the law that was imposed on its residents rather than their moral consciousness propelling the people to do so. So, does an advertising campaign suffice in motivating the people of the town to recycle? In conclusion, after a thorough analysis, considering many of the possible factors, the argument presented by the author is not persuasive enough to warrant an advertising campaign.
The
author
of the letter presents a case for encouraging the
residents
of
Masontown
to
recycle
enough
through an advertising
campaign
. The argument is not cogent
enough
and is full of holes. There are
many
questions that need to
be answered
before
coming to any sort of conclusion.

Citing the municipal garbage disposal fees as the main reason for encouraging the
residents
of
Masontown
, the
author
assumes that majority of the garbage contains products which can
be recycled
.
That is
, there is an appreciable amount of recyclable garbage for the town to
reduce
its municipal costs. No evidence or support
is provided
for this.
So
, what is the proportion of garbage
that is
recyclable in this town? To know this a survey
has to
be conducted
to assess the reality of the situation in
Masontown
. It
might
be the case that there is not
enough
amount of recyclable garbage and the
system
or
recommendation
will fail to
work
if it is the case.

Additionally
, the
author
assumes that the type of garbage present in
Haynesworth
is similar to
Masontown
for the
recommendation
to
work
. Is the garbage in
Masontown
similar to that of in
Haynesworth
? It sure can be the case that
Masontown
produces a
different
type of recyclable
waste
such as metals. The
recommendation
may not
work
here
because
even though
the
people
of
Masontown
recycle
their product, it will not have any effect on the municipal garbage disposal fees as the metals were never part of the garbage in
first
place
. Maybe
people
were selling the metal to
some
shops that
used
to
recycle
them
before
and will continue to do the same afterwards too. This
makes
the
recommendation
unwarranted.

Building upon that, the
author
clearly
misses a huge
point or
he
simply
assumes that there will be a
system
in
place
for recycling the
waste
. How will the
residents
recycle
the
waste
products? Is there any
system
already in
place
for that? If not how much will it cost to build such a
system
? Recycling the
waste
is not a simple process, it requires a certain
system
that ensures that the garbage
is collected
on time and delivered to the factory or any similar
place
. To develop or maintain such a
system
there are
many
costs involved. Like paying the person who collects the recyclable
waste
from
house
to
house
. These
must
be taken
into account
before
going for the advertising campaign.

Lastly
, the
author
implies that the
residents
of
Masontown
will
be motivated
enough
to
recycle
the garbage
just
by the advertising
campaign
. The same
might
have worked in
Haynesworth
but
that does not mean it will
work
here. The reason it
might
have worked in
Haynesworth
might
be due to the law that
was imposed
on its
residents
rather
than their moral consciousness propelling the
people
to do
so
.
So
, does an advertising
campaign
suffice in motivating the
people
of the town to recycle?

In conclusion
, after a thorough analysis, considering
many
of the possible factors, the argument presented by the
author
is not persuasive
enough
to warrant an advertising
campaign
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown: “If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passe

Letter
  American English
6 paragraphs
516 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: