The author of this argument claims that establishing a lottery can help in improving education and public health through tax revenues in the state of Impecunia. In order to substantiate this claim, the citizen refers to the experience of neighboring state Lucria in foundation of such a lottery. The letter also notes that a survey accomplished and published in the state of Impecunia proves the high interest of citizens of this state in gambling. The argument rests on a series on unconvincing assumptions, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands.
First of all, the excerpt's author bases his claim partly on the fact that success of neighboring state in setting up a lottery and taking tax means success of the state of Impercunia. However, the author provides no evidence about wealth condition of two states. If Impercunia state's citizens are poor, people are not able to participate in lottery and spend their money in such places. Lack of such cogent evidence to evaluate the people's lifestyle, I cannot express my compliance to the demand of the citizen who has suggested.
In further support of his claim the letter states that a survey performed in the state of Impercunia discloses high interest and tendency of people living in this toward gambling(an average spending of $50 per person per year). However, since this amount can be skewed by few high amounts, it is not a reliable source to make decision that people like gambling. Besides, this survey has been completed in the capital city, we cannot reach a point that other small and big cities are inclined in gambling.
In addition, the excerpt's author is nearly sure that gabling can be successful in helping children and education. Nevertheless, one cannot forget the negative effects of such lottery. In fact, some people may lose their money there, and then are not able to more support their children. Besides, students may be motivated to spend much money in such a lottery, and distracted on spending om more critical issues. Presence of such risks and providing no information from author to dismiss them, the author cannot defend the importance of building a lottery and its positive effects for education and public health.
The author is of the opinion that paying taxes by the hope-to-be-established lottery can be beneficial. However, we have no information about tax rules in this state. Perhaps, this state totally have low tax law. Or perhaps, some businesses like lottery encounter low tax. Existence of such alternative explanations for not tax and paying it, It is really cumbersome to vote on the achievement of this suggestion.
In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to his claim. To persuade me that this suggestion will be successful, the author must bolster this letter by providing specific information about people's lifestyle and condition in the state of Impercunia. To better evaluate this argument, we need more information about the participants in the survey. We would also need some more document about tax rules in the state of Impercunia.
The
author
of this argument
claims
that establishing a
lottery
can
help
in improving education and public health through
tax
revenues in the
state
of
Impecunia
. In order to substantiate this
claim
, the
citizen
refers to the experience of neighboring
state
Lucria
in foundation of such a
lottery
. The letter
also
notes that a
survey
accomplished and published in the
state
of
Impecunia
proves the high interest of
citizens
of this
state
in gambling. The argument rests on a series on unconvincing assumptions, and is
therefore
unpersuasive as it stands.
First of all
, the excerpt's
author
bases his
claim
partly on the fact that success of neighboring
state
in setting up a
lottery
and taking
tax
means success of the
state
of
Impercunia
.
However
, the
author
provides no evidence about wealth condition of two
states
. If
Impercunia
state's
citizens
are poor,
people
are not able to participate in
lottery
and spend their money in such places. Lack of such cogent evidence to evaluate the
people
's lifestyle, I cannot express my compliance to the demand of the
citizen
who has suggested.
In
further
support of his
claim
the letter
states
that a
survey
performed in the
state
of
Impercunia
discloses high interest and tendency of
people
living in this toward gambling(an average spending of $50 per person per year).
However
, since this amount can
be skewed
by few high amounts, it is not a reliable source to
make
decision that
people
like gambling.
Besides
, this
survey
has
been completed
in the capital city, we cannot reach a point that other
small
and
big
cities
are inclined
in gambling.
In addition
, the excerpt's
author
is
nearly
sure that
gabling
can be successful in helping children and education.
Nevertheless
, one cannot forget the
negative
effects of such
lottery
. In fact,
some
people
may lose their money there, and then are not able to more support their children.
Besides
, students may
be motivated
to spend much money in such a
lottery
, and distracted on spending
om
more critical issues. Presence of such
risks
and providing no
information
from
author
to dismiss them, the
author
cannot defend the importance of building a
lottery
and its
positive
effects for education and public health.
The
author
is of the opinion that paying
taxes
by the hope-to-be-established
lottery
can be beneficial.
However
, we have no
information
about
tax
rules
in this
state
. Perhaps, this
state
totally
have low
tax
law. Or perhaps,
some
businesses like
lottery
encounter low
tax
. Existence of such alternative explanations for not
tax
and paying it, It is
really
cumbersome to vote on the achievement of this suggestion.
In conclusion
, the author's evidence lends
little
credible support to his
claim
. To persuade me that this suggestion will be successful, the
author
must
bolster this letter by providing specific
information
about
people
's lifestyle and condition in the
state
of
Impercunia
. To better evaluate this argument, we need more
information
about the participants in the
survey
. We would
also
need
some
more document about
tax
rules
in the
state
of
Impercunia
.