Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Your friend has asked to recommend a music teacher for his child. Write a letter giving details. 1. How you know about the teacher2. Why you recommend3. Tell how further information can be obtained about lessons. v.1

Your friend has asked to recommend a music teacher for his child. Write a letter giving details. 1. How you know about the teacher2. Why you recommend3. Tell how further information can be obtained about lessons. v. 1
Since the advancement of technology, the society has witnessed an explosion of information to which individuals are granted full access. By having personal computers, smartphones, a few words in Google’s search bar and a click would bring about up-to-date news. As serene as it seems, not all we acquired through such mean is accurate. In my perspective, people should be cautious whether the news is misleading or not. With regard to online data, while a large proportion is considered to be precise, there is still a great deal of deceptive data disseminated throughout the Internet, typically on websites. Due to of the ease of access by computerized devices, it is undoubted that people are able to edit according to their own will, without verification. This can be exemplified by the fact that Wikipedia, favoured by most haphazard students as a source of information, can be altered by anyone to suit their biased opinion. The result of using such raw knowledge for research can cause misconception in a number of people. Likewise, any social media users can post a false report about a matter on their account; were people to be deluded in misinformation, it would render an attempt to recover the truth nerve-racking or even infeasible since any info tends to have a pervasive effect. On the other hand, the risk of exposure to fraud is likely to be higher in correspondence to our belief. For some whose knowledge of online security is limited and indifferent towards the truthfulness of information then they are easier to be swindled. Sinister primarily come from hackers' incentive to seek others personal details from aforementioned users. This, along with the undue trust in unfiltered info negatively affects the credibility of websites that negatively affect the credibility of websites that was presumably reliable. In conclusion, I firmly maintain the idea that it is a crux to process the daily info and we cannot completely depend on what is alluded to. One ought to be a shrewd citizen so as not to fall for the canard.
Since the advancement of technology, the society has witnessed an explosion of information to which individuals
are granted
full access. By having personal computers, smartphones, a few words in Google’s search bar and a click would bring about up-to-date news. As serene as it seems, not all we acquired through such mean is accurate. In my perspective,
people
should be cautious whether the news is misleading or not.

With regard to online data, while a large proportion
is considered
to be precise, there is
still
a great deal of deceptive data disseminated throughout the Internet,
typically
on websites. Due to of the
ease
of access by computerized devices, it
is undoubted
that
people
are able to edit according to their
own
will, without verification. This can
be exemplified
by the fact that Wikipedia,
favoured
by most haphazard students as a source of information, can
be altered
by anyone to suit their biased opinion. The result of using such raw knowledge for research can cause misconception in a number of
people
.
Likewise
, any social media users can post a false report about a matter on their account; were
people
to
be deluded
in misinformation, it would render an attempt to recover the truth nerve-racking or even infeasible since any info tends to have a pervasive effect.

On the other hand
, the
risk
of exposure to fraud is likely to be higher in correspondence to our belief. For
some
whose knowledge of online security
is limited
and indifferent towards the truthfulness of information then they are easier to
be swindled
. Sinister
primarily
come
from hackers' incentive to seek others personal
details
from aforementioned users. This, along with the undue trust in unfiltered info
negatively
affects the credibility of websites that
negatively
affect the credibility of websites that was presumably reliable.

In conclusion
, I
firmly
maintain the
idea
that it is a crux to process the daily
info and
we cannot completely depend on what
is alluded
to. One ought to be a shrewd citizen
so
as not to fall for the canard.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Your friend has asked to recommend a music teacher for his child. Write a letter giving details. 1. How you know about the teacher2. Why you recommend3. Tell how further information can be obtained about lessons. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
340 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts