It is argued that the same level of punishment should be imposed on juvenile delinquents as well as adult offenders if they commit serious crimes. I completely disagree with this view.
Some people may support this suggestion on the ground that all the citizens, regardless of their age, should be treated equally before the law, but I think this argument is flawed. It is true that the level of punishment is supposed to be decided upon how much damage the offender has done to other citizens and the society as a whole. The legal justice seems to be undermined if young people and adults are given different sentences when it comes to the same offence. However, young people are too immature to be regarded as citizens who can be fully responsible for their conduct, especially their misbehavior. Since young people are denied the rights that are exclusively enjoyed by adults such as drinking, smoking, and voting, it is unfair to completely apply adults’ rules to them when they commit crimes.
Furthermore, young people should be given more chances to better themselves because they have more years ahead of them. Adult criminals, who has established mindsets that pose a grave threat to society, should be punished strictly. Young people, by contrast, are malleable enough to redress their values and reintegrate into society. If they receive more rehabilitation than punishment as a consequence of their criminal behavior, they are more likely to become good citizens than their adult equivalents.
To conclude, it is not justified to punish young offenders the same way to penalize adult ones, and I believe young people should be allowed more opportunities to make a difference in their later lives.
It
is argued
that the same level of punishment should
be imposed
on juvenile delinquents
as well
as adult offenders if they commit serious crimes. I completely disagree with this view.
Some
people
may support this suggestion on the ground that all the
citizens
, regardless of their age, should
be treated
equally
before
the law,
but
I
think
this argument
is flawed
. It is true that the level of punishment
is supposed
to
be decided
upon how much damage the offender has done to other
citizens
and the society as a whole. The legal justice seems to
be undermined
if
young
people
and
adults
are
given
different
sentences when it
comes
to the same
offence
.
However
,
young
people
are too immature to
be regarded
as
citizens
who can be
fully
responsible for their conduct,
especially
their misbehavior. Since
young
people
are denied
the rights that are exclusively enjoyed by
adults
such as drinking, smoking, and voting, it is unfair to completely apply
adults’
rules
to them when they commit crimes.
Furthermore
,
young
people
should be
given
more chances to better themselves
because
they have more years ahead of them. Adult criminals, who has established mindsets that pose a grave threat to society, should
be punished
strictly
.
Young
people
, by contrast, are malleable
enough
to redress their values and reintegrate into society. If they receive more rehabilitation than punishment as a consequence of their criminal behavior, they are more likely to become
good
citizens
than their adult equivalents.
To conclude
, it is not justified to punish
young
offenders the same way to penalize adult ones, and I believe
young
people
should be
allowed
more opportunities to
make
a difference in their later
lives
.