At the current time of technological advancement; one of the most pressing concerns regarding the given topic asserts that whether it is true that teachers of the past were more likely to give science to their students as compared teachers of present time due to the advancement in the sources of material? I completely disagree with this statement and shall explore the dimensions and assertions of this time and shape up my opinion by the end.
To begin with, in the past era, there were not many sources of instruction available to students so the lecturer was the only way for them for seeking advice regarding any topic. Therefore, it does not mean that now, in the modern period; due to the availability of gadgets, modern teacher has no role in the development of the pupil. For instance, even a graduate can acquire knowledge from the internet, however, he would not be able to understanding properly the practical operations of that report without the aid of an assistant.
Apart from that, Modern teachers are well-educated and hired a well desirable and respectful place in this world. Moreover, modern teachers not only polish the mind of the graduate by digital method, but also let them understand the social and moral values. Furthermore, the modern study is so complex and harder than past, so professor plays a great role in understanding the scholar each and every aspect of their studies, tinting, how can it be said that modern scholar has no role to play in the education?
In conclusion, I tend to believe that a supervisor is like a lamp who always show the path of the students and brighten up the way of their destination. Whatever the source of knowledge is, without the guidance of teacher, nobody can be success in his life
At the  
current
 time of technological advancement; one of the most pressing concerns regarding the  
given
 topic asserts that whether it is true that  
teachers
 of the past were more likely to give science to their students as compared  
teachers
 of present time due to the advancement in the sources of material? I completely disagree with this statement and shall explore the dimensions and assertions of this time and shape up my opinion by the  
end
.
To  
begin
 with, in the past era, there were not  
many
 sources of instruction available to students  
so
 the lecturer was the  
only
 way for them for seeking advice regarding any topic.  
Therefore
, it does not mean that  
now
, in the  
modern
 period; due to the availability of gadgets,  
modern
  teacher
 has no role in the development of the pupil.  
For instance
, even a graduate can acquire knowledge from the internet,  
however
, he would not be able to understanding  
properly
 the practical operations of that report without the aid of an assistant.
Apart from that,  
Modern
  teachers
 are well-educated and hired a well desirable and respectful place in this world.  
Moreover
,  
modern
  teachers
 not  
only
 polish the mind of the graduate by digital method,  
but
  also
  let
 them understand the social and moral values.  
Furthermore
, the  
modern
 study is  
so
 complex and harder than past,  
so
 professor plays a great role in understanding the scholar each and every aspect of their studies, tinting, how can it  
be said
 that  
modern
 scholar has no role to play in the education? 
In conclusion
, I tend to believe that a supervisor is like a lamp who always  
show
 the path of the students and brighten up the way of their destination. Whatever the source of knowledge is, without the guidance of  
teacher
, nobody can be success in his  
life