Undoubtedly, there is a wide range of salaries in some nations nowadays. It is believed by some people that high earnings are beneficial for a country. At the same time, others think that the government should regulate how much one can earn. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and my opinion about a great amount of incomes will have a positive effect on development.
On the one hand, salaries act as a reward or incentive which incites employee to work harder. For instance, in the USA companies come with different strategies to encourage the employees such as the naming of a worker of the month, reward for overwork are cited as a key example of boosting the confidence of employees. Moreover, workers will get a sense of satisfaction that their effort is valued by the organisation, therefore it strives them to do better which benefits the association.
On the other hand, government should ensure that the country's wealth is being evenly distributed. Limiting salaries will mean that the authority will have more funds to improve public infrastructure, which will aid all people in society. Furthermore, it can be disheartening for some to receive a low salary without much justification. So, controlling incomes will bring more equality. For example, in 19th century USSR had this politics and all people had equal amount of money for their effort.
In my opinion, high salary is a sign of a country's wealth. This is because money always circulates within the country and keep changing hands. The more money in circulation, the more prosperous Moreover, a high income means more taxes which effects on developing. For instance, in the world most developed countries the highest amount of salaries.
In conclusion, regulating the salaries is not the solution for income disparity. It is a key strategy for a country for further developing.
Undoubtedly
, there is a wide range of
salaries
in
some
nations nowadays. It
is believed
by
some
people
that high earnings are beneficial for a
country
. At the same time, others
think
that the
government
should regulate how much one can earn. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and my opinion about a great amount of
incomes
will have a
positive
effect on development.
On the one hand,
salaries
act as a reward or incentive which incites employee to work harder.
For instance
, in the USA
companies
come
with
different
strategies to encourage the employees such as the naming of a worker of the month, reward for overwork
are cited
as a key example of boosting the confidence of employees.
Moreover
, workers will
get
a sense of satisfaction that their effort
is valued
by the
organisation
,
therefore
it strives them to do better which benefits the association.
On the other hand
,
government
should ensure that the country's wealth is being
evenly
distributed. Limiting
salaries
will mean that the authority will have more funds to
improve
public infrastructure, which will aid all
people
in society.
Furthermore
, it can be disheartening for
some
to receive a low
salary
without much justification.
So
, controlling
incomes
will bring more equality.
For example
, in 19th century USSR had this politics and all
people
had equal amount of money for their effort.
In my opinion, high
salary
is a
sign
of a country's wealth. This is
because
money always circulates within the
country
and
keep
changing hands. The more money in circulation, the more prosperous
Moreover
, a high
income
means more taxes which effects on developing.
For instance
, in the world most developed
countries
the highest amount of salaries.
In conclusion
, regulating the
salaries
is not the solution for
income
disparity. It is a key strategy for a
country
for
further
developing.