It has been commonly debated that a vast majority of youthful people are often are often impacted by other people in the identical age in their behaviour and status. As far as I am concerned, this tendency brings about more advantages than disadvantages.
On the negative sides, always people know new people and should communicate with them for vital things such as work and education. In particular, the young people are more enthusiastic than other people for knowing new people. However, they cannot learn positive things from each person. They can have malicious habits like smoking or drinking, as a result of which immature people might do them. In addition, there are some people who tell a lie and persuades young people to detrimental addictions. For instance, particularly aged about 15- 20 people are deceived easily by malign people. In some countries in the world the level of young people who smokes and commits a crime is considerably high. I think that the main reason is that people who are approximately the same age with them have a harmful effect on these people.
Despite the evident drawbacks, I still believe that peer group pressure has more benefits for developing young people. The major advantage of this is that there are a large number of people who cannot describe their behaviour or opinion; therefore, the effects of other people are crucial for these people. Moreover, sometimes the youths might not obtain achievement in any work, as a result of which they do not interest this work. For example, when Michael Phelps was young he could not acquire any achievement. As a result, he wanted to leave swimming; however, three years later he returned swimming with many friends, so he and his friends are 8-time Olympic champion.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the merits of peer group pressure are of more significance when compared to demerits. I recommend that the young people should be careful when communicate with other people.
It has been
commonly
debated that a vast majority of youthful
people
are
often
are
often
impacted by
other
people
in the identical age in their
behaviour
and status. As far as I
am concerned
, this tendency brings about more advantages than disadvantages.
On the
negative
sides, always
people
know new
people
and should communicate with them for vital things such as work and education.
In particular
, the
young
people
are more enthusiastic than
other
people
for knowing new
people
.
However
, they cannot learn
positive
things from each person. They can have malicious habits like smoking or drinking,
as a result
of which immature
people
might do them.
In addition
, there are
some
people
who
tell
a lie and persuades
young
people
to detrimental addictions.
For instance
,
particularly
aged about
15- 20
people
are deceived
easily
by malign
people
. In
some
countries in the world the level of
young
people
who
smokes and commits a crime is
considerably
high. I
think
that the main reason is that
people
who
are approximately the same age with them have a harmful effect on these
people
.
Despite the evident drawbacks, I
still
believe that peer group pressure has more benefits for developing
young
people
. The major advantage of this is that there are
a large number of
people
who
cannot
describe
their
behaviour
or opinion;
therefore
, the effects of
other
people
are crucial for these
people
.
Moreover
,
sometimes
the youths might not obtain achievement in any work,
as a result
of which they do not interest this work.
For example
, when Michael Phelps was
young
he could not acquire any achievement.
As a result
, he wanted to
leave
swimming;
however
, three years later he returned swimming with
many
friends,
so
he and his friends are 8-time Olympic champion.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the merits of peer group pressure are of more significance when compared to demerits. I recommend that the
young
people
should be careful when communicate with
other
people
.