Peace and prosperity are not bound to gender and in fact, they are connected to the qualities that leaders possess. Therefore, I contradict with the given idea that females are better to lead the world than males.
History tells us that males have been better leaders in term of their ruling style and devotion. To judge the state of peace, discrimination between genders is unjust as world’s history is flooded with examples where men leadership lessened chaos around the globe for example in the time of empire system. The given opinion totally has a conflict to what we have today. Countries with least rate of brutality, cruelty and violence such as Sweden and Switzerland are ruled by male governors. The United Kingdom is run by Queen which also has maintained a good prosperity within the state. Again, we have noticed considerable violence and corruptions under the female government in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh!
World’s peace is most injured by the negative use of nuclear technology, differences in religion, poverty and crime rates etc. If a leader gets good control of such conflicting issues, then regardless of gender, peace would prevail worldwide. Maintenance of peace is influenced by making effective foreign relation policies, eliminating poverty, strengthening funding for needy nations and avoiding war. These are real duties of a leader which men women both can do.
Hence, I totally disagree with the idea of relating peace to the gender of a leader. Both men and women should be given equal chances to lead the world. It is just a general rule to be followed that those who desire peace, deserve to be seated in authoritative positions.
Peace
and prosperity are not bound to gender and in fact, they
are connected
to the qualities that
leaders
possess.
Therefore
, I contradict with the
given
idea
that females are better to lead the world than males.
History
tells
us that males have been better
leaders
in term of their ruling style and devotion. To judge the state of
peace
, discrimination between genders is unjust as world’s history
is flooded
with examples where
men
leadership lessened chaos around the globe
for example
in the time of empire system. The
given
opinion
totally
has a conflict to what we have
today
. Countries with
least
rate of brutality, cruelty and violence such as Sweden and Switzerland
are ruled
by male governors. The United Kingdom
is run
by Queen which
also
has maintained a
good
prosperity within the state. Again, we have noticed considerable violence and corruptions under the female
government
in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh!
World’s
peace
is most injured by the
negative
use
of nuclear technology, differences in religion, poverty and crime rates etc. If a
leader
gets
good
control of such conflicting issues, then regardless of gender,
peace
would prevail worldwide. Maintenance of
peace
is influenced
by making effective foreign relation policies, eliminating poverty, strengthening funding for needy nations and avoiding war. These are real duties of a
leader
which
men
women both can do.
Hence
, I
totally
disagree with the
idea
of relating
peace
to the gender of a
leader
. Both
men
and women should be
given
equal chances to lead the world. It is
just
a general
rule
to
be followed
that those who desire
peace
, deserve to
be seated
in authoritative positions.