Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars. 7Wl6n
With the growth of middle classes around the world, ownership of motor cars has become much more common, particularly for those who reside in large urban areas. It has been argued that free public transport should be provided in these metropolises as a method to curb the amount of polluted air and traffic congestion. This essay will explain why this approach should not be undertaken for cost and mobility reasons. The reasons for not providing free public transport for urban residents are diverse. Firstly, there would be a significant cost for the government to pay for this, meaning they would have no option but to raise taxes for individuals rather than for industry which produces more pollution. Secondly, this would be unfair for those who need to use vehicles for more door-to-door travel, such as people who live far from train and bus stations or those who need to carry many things with them. Furthermore, if public transport is free, there would be overcrowding on trains and buses, meaning that people simply replace one type of inconvenience for another. Looking at the argument from a cost perspective, even though there is an initial financial advantage for commuters with savings made on fuel, at some point down the track this would be lost, as municipal governments would have no choice but to raise taxes to pay for the construction, management and maintenance of public transport facilities. If the funds allocated to this were invested in how to make vehicles greener instead, such as with electric cars, the issue of air pollution would be addressed in a more cost-effective way. For example, the city of Taiyuan in China now has better air quality partly due to the investment they made in electric taxis and buses. To summarise, free public transport is not a viable option to reduce road blockages and improve air quality, as there are better cost-efficient ways to do this and the mobility issues it can cause. Moving forward, cities around the world should adopt greener transport options whether they be public or personal to ensure better traffic flow with fewer impurities in the air.
With the growth of middle classes around the world, ownership of motor cars has become much more common,
particularly
for those
who
reside in large urban areas. It has
been argued
that
free
public
transport
should
be provided
in these metropolises as a method to curb the amount of polluted
air
and traffic congestion. This essay will
explain
why this approach should not be undertaken for cost and mobility reasons. The reasons for not providing
free
public
transport
for urban residents are diverse.
Firstly
, there would be a significant cost for the
government
to pay for this, meaning they would have no option
but
to raise taxes for individuals
rather
than for industry which produces more pollution.
Secondly
, this would be unfair for those
who
need to
use
vehicles for more door-to-door travel, such as
people
who
live
far from train and bus stations or those
who
need to carry
many
things with them.
Furthermore
, if
public
transport
is
free
, there would be overcrowding on trains and buses, meaning that
people
simply
replace one type of inconvenience for another.

Looking at the argument from a cost perspective,
even though
there is an initial financial advantage for commuters with savings made on fuel, at
some
point down the
track
this would
be lost
, as municipal
governments
would have no choice
but
to raise taxes to pay for the construction, management and maintenance of
public
transport
facilities. If the funds allocated to this
were invested
in how to
make
vehicles greener
instead
, such as with electric cars, the issue of
air
pollution would
be addressed
in a more cost-effective way.
For example
, the city of Taiyuan in China
now
has better
air
quality partly due to the investment they made in electric taxis and buses. To
summarise
,
free
public
transport
is not a viable option to
reduce
road blockages and
improve
air
quality, as there are better cost-efficient ways to do this and the mobility issues it can cause. Moving forward, cities around the world should adopt greener
transport
options whether they be
public
or personal to ensure better traffic flow with fewer impurities in the
air
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars.

Essay
  American English
2 paragraphs
355 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 5band
    Biography of tyrant people
    If you read biography of tyrant people you will realize that they had hard and bad past always they verdict everything to others And they like that everyone is obedient to them And kneel before them These oppressors always caused tumult But first of all, they are in a bad mood and feel dejected Thes...
  • 6band
    their elderly family members differently in most
    People take care of their elderly family members differently in most nations. The ageing population are taken of geriatric care professionals in old age homes mostly in Western countries than it is practiced by African nationals. It is a real undoing to the old people to be isolated from their famil...
  • 6band
    Judge, be judged, or try to be a good man
    Fashion on a person's worth is constantly changing. I agree that we all judged people based on their appearance, social rank, and quantity of credit cards ten years ago, but now we don't do it. Instead, we blame people for their civil position, sexual preferences, and mental diseases. I am from Ukr...
  • 5.5band
    Many of today most urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation
    it is concerned that many people believe that these days there are various affairs all over the world which can be solved by a global aid. according to my perspective I completely agree with the statement this issue like a population and health question can be solved by the cooperation. this essay w...
  • 5band
    comparison of the sunnyHills university campus from 1995 up to now
    If I want to make a comparison of sunnyhills university campus from 1995 u to now, at the first sight, it's obvious that green spaces are less than before and buildings are expanded, nowadays, buildings are scattered over the campus, but in 1995, it seems that educational and formal buildings were p...
  • 6band
    Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large organizations can.
    It is thought that only governments and large companies can make positive impacts in improving the environment while individuals are powerless to do likewise. Admittedly, large companies and governments can affect short-term improvements on the environment. However, I do not agree with the assertion...





Get more results for topic: