What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Should art be encouraged more?
It is argued that the significance of art diminishes as technology and science develop. However, I do not share this view, for art brings a great deal of value to our lives as the most versatile means of human expression, which is also why more and more people should be encouraged to practice it. To start, there is no invention in the world that can substitute art as a facilitator of expression. In fact, most innovations in technology rely on the governing principles of art – creativity, flexibility, and originality – in order to win the minds and hearts of people. Social media platforms are a good case in point; These networking tools allow their users to express themselves through every possible artform, whether it be the simple craft of writing or the shooting of dynamic video rich in details. Further, whereas science and technology are limited by our current understanding of what they are and how much of them we can apply in the real-world context, the only constraint in art is our imagination which is known to be boundless. This should be good enough reason to argue that no amount of scientific innovation can replace art.
Given this importance of art, there should be little doubt as to whether it should be encouraged among people. It is not just the creative process involved in art that makes it relevant to our lives, but also hard work that goes into it. Most art projects are known to require one long hours to refine an artwork and make it appealing to the senses, so anyone practicing art would acquire valuable qualities such as patience, diligence, and appreciation in the process. In addition, if students were taught art class from an early age, they would develop a range of skills that might help with other areas of their studies. It has been found that students who take art classes like painting or playing a musical instrument along with their academic subjects are more likely to use creative approaches to science problems than those who do not.
In conclusion, despite what other people argue, I would like to reiterate that the importance of art cannot be brought into comparison with technology and science. People should be encouraged to be more artistic as it can teach some desirable qualities as well as skills.
What are the things artists can do
but
the scientist cannot? Should
art
be encouraged
more?
It
is argued
that the significance of
art
diminishes as
technology
and
science
develop.
However
, I do not share this view, for
art
brings a great deal of value to our
lives
as the most versatile means of human expression, which is
also
why more and more
people
should
be encouraged
to practice it. To
start
, there is no invention in the world that can substitute
art
as a facilitator of expression. In fact, most innovations in
technology
rely on the governing principles of
art
–
creativity, flexibility, and originality
–
in order to win the minds and hearts of
people
. Social media platforms are a
good
case in point; These networking tools
allow
their users to express themselves through every possible
artform
, whether it be the simple craft of writing or the shooting of dynamic video rich in
details
.
Further
, whereas
science
and
technology
are limited
by our
current
understanding of what they are and how much of them we can apply in the real-world context, the
only
constraint in
art
is our imagination which
is known
to be boundless. This should be
good
enough
reason to argue that no amount of scientific innovation can replace art.
Given
this importance of
art
, there should be
little
doubt
as to whether
it should
be encouraged
among
people
. It is not
just
the creative process involved in
art
that
makes
it relevant to our
lives
,
but
also
hard
work that goes into it. Most
art
projects
are known
to require one long hours to refine an artwork and
make
it appealing to the senses,
so
anyone practicing
art
would acquire valuable qualities such as patience, diligence, and appreciation in the process.
In addition
, if students
were taught
art
class
from an early age, they would develop a range of
skills
that might
help
with other areas of their studies. It has
been found
that students who take
art
classes like painting or playing a musical instrument along with their academic subjects are more likely to
use
creative approaches to
science
problems than those who do not.
In conclusion
, despite what other
people
argue, I would like to reiterate that the importance of
art
cannot
be brought
into comparison with
technology
and
science
.
People
should
be encouraged
to be more artistic as it can teach
some
desirable qualities
as well
as
skills
.