The argument between university books and the internet is popular in today’s generation. I wholeheartedly agree, that course books are irreplaceable, and the internet will never surpass the essentials of books.
Books have legitimate information and far more factual than the data that students read online because course books are written by educational experts. Thus, it has undergone a sheer process and reviews before a publishing company would release it to the public and universities. Subsequently, books are more substantial and accurate than online articles. On the other hand, anyone can publish any data or written information with regard to any school syllabus on the internet without entering into a stringent process which books underwent. Moreover, articles online are mostly flexible and can be edited by anyone. For example, the prominent website of Wikipedia, wherein, they gave their users the capacity to edit and add data to all published topic on their page. Consequently, these made their articles inaccurate.
Learning by the use of computers is not that effective to students, amid various amount of distraction that they encountered while using their personal computers. For instance, social media nowadays are very addicting to students. Hence, these were tempting disturbances while studying online, because of its easy accessibility on the computer. Whereas, students can focus and absorb numerous significant knowledge and information while reading books, in which distractions are obscure.
In conclusion, traditional course books are too great to overcome and surpass by the internet. I agree with this notion because books are more substantial and factual than the published information on the internet.
The argument between university
books
and the internet is popular in
today
’s generation. I
wholeheartedly
agree
, that course
books
are irreplaceable, and the internet will never surpass the essentials of books.
Books have legitimate
information
and far more factual than the data that
students
read
online
because
course
books
are written
by educational experts.
Thus
, it has undergone a sheer process and reviews
before
a publishing
company
would release it to the public and universities.
Subsequently
,
books
are more substantial and accurate than
online
articles.
On the other hand
, anyone can publish any data or written
information
with regard to any school syllabus on the internet without entering into a stringent process which
books
underwent.
Moreover
, articles
online
are
mostly
flexible and can
be edited
by anyone.
For example
, the prominent website of Wikipedia, wherein, they gave their users the capacity to edit and
add
data to all published topic on their page.
Consequently
, these made their articles inaccurate.
Learning by the
use
of computers is not that effective to
students
, amid various amount of distraction that they encountered while using their personal computers.
For instance
, social media nowadays are
very
addicting to
students
.
Hence
, these were tempting disturbances while studying
online
,
because
of its easy accessibility on the computer. Whereas,
students
can focus and absorb numerous significant knowledge and
information
while reading
books
, in which distractions are obscure.
In conclusion
, traditional course
books
are too great to overcome and surpass by the internet. I
agree
with this notion
because
books
are more substantial and factual than the published
information
on the internet.