Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. kq8O
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim. I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth. In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
Some
people
argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of

animals
because
we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this

point of view.

In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild
animals
have no place in the 21st

century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists
only
for the benefit of humans, and

there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we
suddenly


have the right to
allow
or encourage the extinction of any species.
Furthermore
, there

is no compelling reason why we should
let
animals
die
out. We do not need to exploit

or
destroy
every last square
metre
of land in order to feed or accommodate the

world’s population. There is
plenty
of room for us to exist side by side with wild

animals, and this should be our aim.

I
also
disagree with the
idea
that protecting
animals
is a waste of resources.

the
protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild
animals
, and most

scientists
agree
that these habitats are
also
crucial for human survival.
For example
,

rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and
stabilise
the Earth’s climate. If

we
destroyed
these areas, the costs of managing the resulting
changes
to our planet

would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild
animals
and their

habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.

In conclusion
, we have no right to decide
whether or not
wild
animals
should exist,

and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.

Essay
  American English
7 paragraphs
265 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts