Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualification and experience, to what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion with example. v.5

While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualification and experience, Give your opinion with example. v. 5
When speaking about interviews, we often focus on the employee or the candidate, and forget about the importance of recruiting the right candidate from an employer's perspective. Recruiting for a post is equally challenging and time-consuming for an employer, as it is for an employee. There are several different qualities of a person that are required to successfully deliver a task, but is it possible to assess all of these in an interview? Educational qualifications and work experience, by far, are the most relied upon in terms of assessing a candidate. To some extent, I agree with this- you don't want to and potentially cannot, recruit an engineer for the job of a doctor or vice versa. So, the degree is definitely a first tick box that is required. Experience comes next. A project manager with a decade of experience might arguably be better at handling situations and foreseeing potential risks, than a fresh university graduate. He might also be better in tactfully engaging and liaising with stakeholders or customers. Thus, in my opinion, recruiting people based on their personal qualities, can yield much more to a job role than it is often anticipated. But simply ticking these two tick boxes do not always mean that you are recruiting the best candidate. Often in the real world, it's the soft skills/ people skills that take you far. These cannot be learnt at Universities and unfortunately, quite a lot of these depend on people's personalities and traits. For example, a Harvard graduate who manages a team of people is no good if he is not a good leader and does not treat his team with empathy and compassion. No one would want to work for him and eventually the company will have a high attrition rate, leading to unmet targets. On the contrary, a person who has just graduated from college but has dealt with a lot in his personal life (losing loves ones, facing hardships and financial difficulties, etc. ) would have much more resilience and perseverance. This in turn, would be invaluable to the company. In conclusion, I believe education and experience has some role to play in order to ensure that the person is qualified enough to do the job. But delving too much into this, carries the risk of not identifying the importance of personal traits in contributing to a job role.
When speaking about interviews, we
often
focus on the employee or the
candidate
, and forget about the importance of
recruiting
the right
candidate
from an employer's perspective.
Recruiting
for a post is
equally
challenging and time-consuming for an employer, as it is for an employee. There are several
different
qualities of a person that
are required
to
successfully
deliver a task,
but
is it possible to assess all of these in an interview?

Educational qualifications and work
experience
, by far, are the most relied upon in terms of assessing a
candidate
. To
some
extent, I
agree
with this- you don't want to and
potentially
cannot, recruit an engineer for the
job
of a doctor or vice versa.
So
, the degree is definitely a
first
tick box that
is required
.
Experience
comes
next
. A project manager with a decade of
experience
might
arguably
be better at handling situations and foreseeing potential
risks
, than a fresh university graduate. He might
also
be better in
tactfully
engaging and liaising with stakeholders or customers.
Thus
, in my opinion,
recruiting
people
based on their personal qualities, can yield much more to a
job
role than it is
often
anticipated.

But
simply
ticking these two tick boxes do not always mean that you are
recruiting
the best
candidate
.
Often
in the real world, it's the soft
skills
/
people
skills
that take you far. These cannot be
learnt at
Universities and unfortunately, quite
a lot of
these depend on
people
's personalities and traits.
For example
, a Harvard graduate who manages a team of
people
is no
good
if he is not a
good
leader and does not treat his team with empathy and compassion. No one would want to work for him and
eventually
the
company
will have a high attrition rate, leading to unmet targets.
On the contrary
, a person who has
just
graduated from college
but
has dealt with a lot in his personal life (losing
loves
ones, facing hardships and financial difficulties, etc.
)
would have much more resilience and perseverance. This in turn, would be invaluable to the
company
.

In conclusion
, I believe education and
experience
has
some
role to play in order to ensure that the person
is qualified
enough
to do the
job
.
But
delving too much into this, carries the
risk
of not identifying the importance of personal traits in contributing to a
job
role.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
16Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes
Language is not a genetic gift, it is a social gift. Learning a new language is becoming a member of the club – the community of speakers of that language.
Frank Smith

IELTS essay While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualification and experience, Give your opinion with example. v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
395 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts