Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

What technology are for the environment?is it destroy force or a situation? Do need stop using technology to save environment? Why or why not?

What technology are for the environment? is it destroy force or a situation? Do need stop using technology to save environment? Why or why not? PWREE
There is a drastic change in each and every field due to rapid advancement in technology. Now a days, the technology is more focused on the basis of the environment and people are use to the environment it is a very use but people do not stop use the environment. Discuss the topic in following paragraphs. To begin with, the technology is more increase day by day. Technology is hazardous for the environment. Pollution is rapidly increase due to the more usage of the technology. Companies are use the various type of the technology afterthat the factory west water transfered in to the river there are many effect on human body. People are use of the hydropower plant they reduse the usage of the coal so, they can reduce the pollution. To additionally, generally people are usage of the ebook therefore save the environment by the human and they reduce the cut of tree. For exemplify, now a days the education system provided through online as well as the material provide online so the people are least usage of the hard copy the percentage of the cut of trees reduced. Moreover, the worst effect due to the more usage of the technology and in the future the humanlife will affected hazardous. To conclude, it is not necessary to stop using the technology for environment. so, it is write way to save the environment.
There is a drastic
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in each and every field due to rapid advancement in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
.
Did you mean "nowadays"?
Now a days
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
is more focused on the basis of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
Did you mean "used"?
use
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
it is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. Discuss the topic in following paragraphs. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
is more increase day by day.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Technology
is hazardous for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. Pollution is
rapidly
Consider using a past participle here: "increased".
increase
due to the more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
usage
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Companies
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the various type of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
Possible spelling mistake found.
afterthat
the factory west water
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "transferred", the past tense form of the verb 'transfer'?
transfered
in to the river there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
effect on human body.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of the hydropower plant they
Possible spelling mistake found.
reduse
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
usage
of the coal
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
, they can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the pollution. To
additionally
,
generally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
usage
of the
Possible spelling mistake found.
ebook
therefore
save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
by the
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
human and
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
of tree. For exemplify,
Did you mean "nowadays"?
now a days
the education system provided through online
as well
as the material provide online
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are
A determiner is probably missing here: "the least".
least
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
usage
of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
copy the percentage of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
of trees
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
.
Moreover
, the worst effect due to the more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
usage
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
and in the future the
Possible spelling mistake found.
humanlife
will
The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: "affect"
affected
hazardous.
To conclude
, it is not necessary to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technology
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
so
, it is
Consider using a past participle here: "written".
write
way to save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay What technology are for the environment? is it destroy force or a situation? Do need stop using technology to save environment? Why or why not?

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
233 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • What technology are for the environment?is it destroy force or a situation? Do need stop using technology to save environment? Why or why not?