What famous person would you like to visit for one hour? Explain why you would like to meet and what would you talk about? v.2
What famous person would you like to visit for one hour? Explain why you would like to meet and what would you talk about? v. 2
Nowadays, in many countries, traffic and transportation issues have garnered a lot of public attention. Some people claim that it is better to live in urban areas than in rural areas to solve traffic and transportation issues. I totally disagree with it since it certainly can lead to many other problems.
Firstly, the migration of people from farmlands to cities may lead to a number of demerits. To be more specific, cities are areas of dense population; therefore, it will be difficult to find accomodation or jobs and the qualities of urban life will decrease. In addition, because of the cost of living in cities is quite expensive, it exceeds the reach of a middle family class. As a result, many social problems, such as underemployment, homelessness, may arise.
Secondly, this issue will cause more environmental consequences. For instance, as these places are covered by a lot of kind of transportation systems, especially now each individual expects to have an own vehicle, which results in the fact that our environment becomes more severely contaminated/polluted. Also, because the demand for travelling increases, traffic congestion, which is one of the world’s serious problems, will increase. Besides that, dense population could lead to many companies or factories founded. This, as a consequence, is one of main causes which harms directly to our environment.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the movement from countryside to cities is not the good way to solve the traffic and transportation issues. In the future, the government should have other better solutions to combat this issue.
Nowadays, in
many
countries,
traffic
and
transportation
issues
have garnered
a lot of
public attention.
Some
people
claim that it is better to
live
in urban areas than in rural areas to solve
traffic
and
transportation
issues
. I
totally
disagree with it since it
certainly
can lead to
many
other problems.
Firstly
, the migration of
people
from farmlands to
cities
may lead to a number of demerits. To be more specific,
cities
are areas of dense population;
therefore
, it will be difficult to find
accomodation
or jobs and the qualities of urban life will decrease.
In addition
,
because
of the cost of living in
cities
is quite expensive, it exceeds the reach of a middle family
class
.
As a result
,
many
social problems, such as underemployment, homelessness, may arise.
Secondly
, this
issue
will cause more environmental consequences.
For instance
, as these places
are covered
by
a lot of kind
of
transportation
systems,
especially
now
each individual
expects
to have an
own
vehicle, which results in the fact that our environment becomes more
severely
contaminated/polluted.
Also
,
because
the demand for travelling increases,
traffic
congestion, which is one of the world’s serious problems, will increase.
Besides
that, dense population could lead to
many
companies
or factories founded. This, as a consequence, is one of main causes which harms
directly
to our environment.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that the movement from countryside to
cities
is not the
good
way to solve the
traffic
and
transportation
issues
. In the future, the
government
should have other better solutions to combat this
issue
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes