Nowadays, there has been an increase in the use of CCTV in public places as a measure to reduce crime. While some people believe that there are a lot of positives of using video cameras, others think that the negatives should be taken into consideration. In this essay, I will discuss both views of them.
On the one hand, CCTV can be beneficial for both inhabitants and countries. The first objection is that video surveillance can help to protect us and deter criminals as cameras have been installed in many public areas. In this way, petty crimes like pocketing and stealing are considerably prevented since criminals conceive that they are being watched by authorities and police offers. Moreover, public cameras are significantly supportive tools for police officers to detect suspects and catch criminals. By this way, they can keep cities safer for residents, visitors and workers alike, which will attract more travelers to visit the countries and contribute to developing tourism industry.
On the other hand, many people might disapprove of public cameras because of some reasons. Firstly, it is said that this surveillance violates our privacy due to the widely use of public security cameras. In other words, people feel like frustrated as their movements are recorded anytime, which obviously restricts their individual freedom and encroach their personal space as well. Secondly, it has been shown that investment in a numerous number of security cameras for controlling crime is extremely expensive, which will be wasteful if they are not effective enough to stop crime completely.
In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages of CCTV that the government should consider before using them to combat crime
Nowadays, there has been an increase in the
use
of CCTV in
public
places as a measure to
reduce
crime
. While
some
people
believe that there are
a lot of
positives of using video
cameras
, others
think
that the negatives should
be taken
into consideration. In this essay, I will discuss both views of them.
On the one hand, CCTV can be beneficial for both inhabitants and countries. The
first
objection is that video surveillance can
help
to protect us and deter criminals as
cameras
have
been installed
in
many
public
areas. In this way, petty
crimes
like pocketing and stealing are
considerably
prevented
since criminals conceive that they are being
watched
by authorities and police offers.
Moreover
,
public
cameras
are
significantly
supportive tools for police officers to detect suspects and catch criminals. By this way, they can
keep
cities safer for residents, visitors and workers alike, which will attract more travelers to visit the countries and contribute to developing tourism industry.
On the other hand
,
many
people
might disapprove of
public
cameras
because
of
some
reasons.
Firstly
, it
is said
that this surveillance violates our privacy due to the
widely
use
of
public
security
cameras
.
In other words
,
people
feel like frustrated as their movements
are recorded
anytime, which
obviously
restricts their individual freedom and encroach their personal space
as well
.
Secondly
, it has
been shown
that investment in a numerous number of security
cameras
for controlling
crime
is
extremely
expensive, which will be wasteful if they are not effective
enough
to
stop
crime
completely.
In conclusion
, there are both advantages and disadvantages of CCTV that the
government
should consider
before
using them to combat
crime