Nowadays, individuals are frequently exposed to various
types of language learning at an early age to chase the pace
of globalization. It is argued by many linguists that people
need to give the same level of attention to four skills in order
to achieve proficiency in the language they are learning.
However, I disagree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, it is noteworthy that modern world is greatly
polarized by specialization in industrial sectors. Nowadays,
studies have shown that although it is invisible, an
increasing number of people may only study languages for
specific working purposes in narrow field. Therefore, it would
be an overkill to give the same weight to these four
competencies. For example, in a foreign company whose
main business is mechanical engineering, contrary to public
belief, many professionals do not have to speak English
fluently, because being able to read designs and reply emails
proficiently is enough to get the job done. This example is the
illustration of the fact that spending time to improve
listening or speaking may just be complementary but not
materially help to advance work performance, instead, they
need to put more efforts on reading and writing.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this
is that learning four skills equally is essential to certain
people. For example, for those students who major in a
particular foreign language, mastering all these skills is
beneficial to their further researches. Similarly, for those
students who plan to further education abroad, they must
pick up all four skills to better live and study in a foreign
country. This argument is true some degree; however, it is
incomplete, what they fail to take into account is the fact
that a foreign language is more applied in reading and writing
for ordinary college students. In fact, they often need to read
numerous foreign references and articles as well as write
reports in foreign languages. Meanwhile, most students are
not given opportunities to communicate with foreigners and
therefore speaking and listening skills are relatively
insignificant.
In conclusion, while the balance of four key skills of language
learning is important, it is unwise to force every single one to
know all these well for reasons mentioned above.
Nowadays, individuals are
frequently
exposed to various
types of
language
learning at an early age to chase the pace
of globalization. It
is argued
by
many
linguists that
people
need to give the same level of attention to four
skills
in order
to achieve proficiency in the
language
they are learning.
However
, I disagree with this viewpoint.
Firstly
, it is noteworthy that modern world is
greatly
polarized by specialization in industrial sectors. Nowadays,
studies have shown that although it is invisible, an
increasing number of
people
may
only
study
languages
for
specific working purposes in narrow field.
Therefore
, it would
be an overkill to give the same weight to these four
competencies.
For example
, in a
foreign
company
whose
main business is mechanical engineering, contrary to public
belief,
many
professionals do not
have to
speak English
fluently
,
because
being able to read designs and reply emails
proficiently
is
enough
to
get
the job done. This example is the
illustration of the fact that spending time to
improve
listening or speaking may
just
be complementary
but
not
materially
help
to advance work performance,
instead
, they
need to put more efforts on reading and writing.
Secondly
, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this
is that learning four
skills
equally
is essential to certain
people
.
For example
, for those students who major in a
particular
foreign
language
, mastering all these
skills
is
beneficial to their
further
researches.
Similarly
, for those
students who plan to
further
education abroad, they
must
pick up all four
skills
to better
live
and study in a foreign
country. This argument is true
some
degree;
however
, it is
incomplete, what they fail to take into account is the fact
that a
foreign
language
is more applied in reading and writing
for ordinary college students. In fact, they
often
need to read
numerous
foreign
references and articles
as well
as write
reports in
foreign
languages
. Meanwhile, most students are
not
given
opportunities to communicate with foreigners and
therefore
speaking and listening
skills
are
relatively
insignificant.
In conclusion
, while the balance of four key
skills
of language
learning is
important
, it is unwise to force every single one to
know all these well for reasons mentioned above.