Violence in the media promotes violent activities? To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
Violence in the media promotes violent activities? v. 1
It is important to consider how violence influences people, and what its root causes are? While some people contend that one of the major reason of violence is media, other deem that it is trifial. I tend to partially agree with the statement, and in this essay, I will support my views with examples.
To begin, medias may promote violence in the community, for it often engenders violent content, and this may subconsiously inflict individuals. This is because people may imitate dreadful behaviors learnt through medias; also, they might copy the know-how of crimes. For example, a person, who goes through violent contents regularly, is likable to commite misdeeds than one who doesnot. However, if medias do not bombard violent news, people will not be pschologically craved to involve in one. This happens because people may not be aware about crime unless medias promote violent conducts.
Nonetheless, medias are not the only one to blame. To clarity, it may have something to do with the upbringing; for example, a person, who is exposed to the hard-up childhood, is likely to involve in the criminal intent. In addition, some may have an innate violent nature. For instance, some notorious leaders like hitler, as said by some scholars, had inborn mental defects, so they were violent. Besides that, medias also promote benefitial programs, therefore, we should not always blame medias for chronic crimial conducts.
In conclusion, although medias promote violence, for it influences people subconsiously and they may imitate harmful activities, we must take into consideration the upbringings and innate character. Thus, I partially agree with the arguments.
It is
important
to consider how
violence
influences
people
, and what its root causes are? While
some
people
contend that one of the major reason of
violence
is
media
, other deem that it is
trifial
. I tend to
partially
agree
with the statement, and in this essay, I will support my views with examples.
To
begin
,
medias
may
promote
violence
in the community, for it
often
engenders
violent
content, and this may
subconsiously
inflict individuals. This is
because
people
may imitate dreadful behaviors
learnt
through
medias
;
also
, they might copy the know-how of crimes.
For example
, a person, who goes through
violent
contents
regularly
, is likable to
commite
misdeeds than one who
doesnot
.
However
, if
medias
do not bombard
violent
news,
people
will not be
pschologically
craved to involve in one. This happens
because
people
may not be aware about crime unless
medias
promote
violent
conducts.
Nonetheless,
medias
are not the
only
one to blame. To clarity, it may have something to do with the upbringing;
for example
, a person, who
is exposed
to the
hard
-up childhood, is likely to involve in the criminal intent.
In addition
,
some
may have an innate
violent
nature.
For instance
,
some
notorious leaders like
hitler
, as said by
some
scholars, had inborn mental defects,
so
they were
violent
.
Besides
that,
medias
also
promote
benefitial
programs,
therefore
, we should not always blame
medias
for chronic
crimial
conducts.
In conclusion
, although
medias
promote
violence
, for it influences
people
subconsiously and
they may imitate harmful activities, we
must
take into consideration the upbringings and innate character.
Thus
, I
partially
agree
with the arguments.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
29Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
10Mistakes