Some people suggest that school curriculums should include critical life skills such as handling of money as only a limited number of school children learn the value of money. I agree with the above idea as some parents are reluctant or do not have enough time to teach necessary life skills to their children at home.
The value of money can be taught at home, but some parents do not allow children to handle money until they become older. In other words, children have limited opportunities to learn about finances and consequently, they are more likely to have a trouble in making ends meet and prone to have debts once they start living independently. But why parents do not want to share monetary information with their kids? One possible reason would be a financial issue. If there is a monetary problem within a family, parents do not want to let children know about it.
Furthermore, many parents are busy at work, and less time is spent with their children to teach necessary skills. For these reasons, schools are good places to teach children about the value of money.
Incorporating this critical life skill into a school curriculum benefits children so that they become prepared for the future. If these important skills are taught at schools, children have an equal opportunity no matter what their family backgrounds are. If the value of money is learnt at a young age, less people will have debts in the future and money is spent wisely.
In conclusion, although parents owe the responsibility to teach their children how to manage finances to some extent, they are busy at work and sometimes hard for them to teach this kind of skill if they were having a financial issue; therefore, schools should incorporate this subject into a curriculum so that all children have an equal opportunity to learn the value of money.
Some
people
suggest that
school
curriculums should include critical life
skills
such as handling of
money
as
only
a limited number of
school
children
learn the
value
of
money
. I
agree
with the above
idea
as
some
parents
are reluctant or do not have
enough
time to
teach
necessary life
skills
to their
children
at home.
The
value
of
money
can
be taught
at home,
but
some
parents
do not
allow
children
to handle
money
until they become older.
In other words
,
children
have limited opportunities to learn about finances and
consequently
, they are more likely to have a trouble in making ends
meet
and prone to have debts once they
start
living
independently
.
But
why
parents
do not want to share monetary information with their kids? One possible reason would be a financial issue. If there is a monetary problem within a family,
parents
do not want to
let
children
know about it.
Furthermore
,
many
parents
are busy at work, and less time
is spent
with their
children
to
teach
necessary
skills
. For these reasons,
schools
are
good
places to
teach
children
about the
value
of money.
Incorporating this critical life
skill
into a
school
curriculum benefits
children
so
that they become prepared for the future. If these
important
skills
are taught
at
schools
,
children
have an equal opportunity no matter what their family backgrounds are. If the
value
of
money
is
learnt at
a young age,
less
people
will have debts in the future and
money
is spent
wisely
.
In conclusion
, although
parents
owe the responsibility to
teach
their
children
how to manage finances to
some
extent, they are busy at work and
sometimes
hard
for them to
teach
this kind of
skill
if they were having a financial issue;
therefore
,
schools
should incorporate this subject into a curriculum
so
that all
children
have an equal opportunity to learn the
value
of
money
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
46Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes