It is commonly identifiable that the upper education is effective method to alleviate the poverty for those student who are living under the poverty line, thus many discussions are around on this topic. One of which regards on the university' s tuition fee whether it should be free for everyone. While I tend toward the viewpoint that this could have great benefit to all students as well as the university, I would admit that there are some drawbacks behind.
One argument put forwards in favor of the waiving of tuition free is that all students can have same chance to place themselves into university. Currently, the tuition fee of university already imposes a great burden on a middle class family, let alone the family under poverty line. Sorrowfully, some students who are qualified to study university was unwillingly given up this chance due to cash crunch. We can avoid this situation as long as university no longer charge tuition fee. Meanwhile, the university itself can have beneficial impact as more eligible students are available and they can choose the best among them. This is win win situation, seemingly.
However, reaching the conclusion that waiving tuition fee for university students is conductive does not mean we can ignore the negative consequences behind, especially on university and society. In many counties, the majority of university funding are largely from the governments and tuition fee. The waive of tuition fee will result in either reduction of university resources or subsidization of the tuition from government. The first one will inevitably set back the teaching quality. The later one will impose a great financial pressure on the governments, causing the cost cutting on other areas such as social welfare.
Definitely, free university education would appeal every students, but we cannot recklessly finance all students when social resource is being concerned. The government should strategically allocate the limited financial resource to the student who has actual need.
It is
commonly
identifiable that the upper education is effective method to alleviate the poverty for those
student
who are living under the poverty line,
thus
many
discussions are around on this topic. One of which regards on the
university&
#039; s tuition
fee
whether it should be free for everyone. While I tend toward the viewpoint that this could have great benefit to all
students
as well
as the
university
, I would admit that there are
some
drawbacks behind.
One argument put forwards in favor of the waiving of tuition free is that all
students
can have same chance to place themselves into
university
.
Currently
, the tuition
fee
of
university
already imposes a great burden on a middle
class
family,
let
alone the family under poverty line.
Sorrowfully
,
some
students
who
are qualified
to study
university
was
unwillingly
given
up this chance due to cash crunch. We can avoid this situation as long as
university
no longer charge tuition
fee
. Meanwhile, the
university
itself can have beneficial impact as more eligible
students
are
available and
they can choose the best among them. This is
win win
situation,
seemingly
.
However
, reaching the conclusion that waiving tuition
fee
for
university
students
is conductive does not mean we can
ignore
the
negative
consequences behind
,
especially
on
university
and society. In
many
counties, the majority of
university
funding are
largely
from the
governments
and tuition
fee
.
The waive
of tuition
fee
will result in either reduction of
university
resources or subsidization of the tuition from
government
. The
first
one will
inevitably
set back the teaching quality.
The
later one will impose a great financial pressure on the
governments
, causing the
cost cutting
on other areas such as social welfare.
Definitely, free
university
education would appeal every
students
,
but
we cannot
recklessly
finance all
students
when social resource is
being concerned
. The
government
should
strategically
allocate the limited financial resource to the
student
who has actual need.