It is quiet common these days to see some catchphrases for women's rights, and a lot of arguments are going on for providing more opportunities for women to be as equal as men. This question states that universities should accept men and women equally in any subject. In this essay, I will discuss my view, and draw my conclusion in this argument.
No doubt that some subjects are fitting better for a specific gender. For example, some subjects need more muscles and horrific power while other subjects need multitasking ability and critical vision. Having equal numbers in the previous subjects is unfair and it will be like asking for equality by doing the opposite.
Also, the acceptance process should depend on subject competencies and requirements regardless the gender. Certainly, it acquires you to study a subject to have the knowledge and the prerequisite for that subject. Being women and men will not play a role in that unless the subject will fit better for the other gender.
Equality between genders is desirable in any field, but asking for equal numbers will harm the university standards, likewise, it will lead to ethical problems. If the university accepts a female over a male, who has qualifications that beat hers, the university standards will absolutely over the year diminish as a result. Moreover, acceptance of a gender over the other, even if the subject requirements are clear who should be chosen, will be ethically unacceptable and will harm the university reputation over the years.
In conclusion, I believe that treating women equally is dependable, but splitting the vacancies equally between men and women for every subject is unreasonable. An acceptance process in universities must depend on the subject requirements to be fairer, and to achieve the meaning of equality, and this is actually what women are looking for.
It is quiet common these days to
see
some
catchphrases for women's rights, and
a lot of
arguments are going on for providing more opportunities for
women
to be as equal as
men
. This question states that
universities
should accept
men
and
women
equally
in any
subject
. In this essay, I will discuss my view, and draw my conclusion in this argument.
No doubt that
some
subjects
are fitting better for a specific gender.
For example
,
some
subjects
need more muscles and horrific power while other
subjects
need multitasking ability and critical vision. Having equal numbers in the previous
subjects
is unfair and it will be like asking for equality by doing the opposite.
Also
, the acceptance process should depend on
subject
competencies and requirements regardless the gender.
Certainly
, it acquires you to study a
subject
to have the knowledge and the prerequisite for that
subject
. Being
women
and
men
will not play a role in that unless the
subject
will fit better for the other gender.
Equality between genders is desirable in any field,
but
asking for equal numbers will harm the
university
standards,
likewise
, it will lead to ethical problems. If the
university
accepts a female
over
a male, who has qualifications that beat hers, the
university
standards will
absolutely
over
the year diminish
as a result
.
Moreover
, acceptance of a gender
over
the other, even if the
subject
requirements are
clear
who should
be chosen
, will be
ethically
unacceptable and will harm the
university
reputation
over
the years.
In conclusion
, I believe that treating
women
equally
is dependable,
but
splitting the vacancies
equally
between
men
and
women
for every
subject
is unreasonable. An acceptance process in
universities
must
depend on the
subject
requirements to be fairer, and to achieve the meaning of equality, and this is actually what
women
are looking for.