Gender equality will always remain a controversial topic over subsequent generations. Moreover, it is claimed that universities have to approve the requests of equal numbers of men and women among its students in each matter of study. However, this essay will argue why this is totally unnecessary.
Despite some challenges, higher education institutions should accept the same proportion of male and female students in every subject. Furthermore, it must be a significant rule determined by the governments in each country to make sure that everyone gets a fair chance without any prejudice towards a specific gender. For example, in Japan, while a driving class has a significant number of girls, male participants of a dancing lesson constitute almost the same percentage as females. Therefore, colleges must consider sex equality when accepting their candidates.
On the contrary, biological differences exist between men and women and this has a natural impact upon their choices. In addition, there is no harm in distributing people so that they can land where they belong without imposing their decisions. For instance, in the USA, professors care more about helping their candidates to figure out who they really are and what they want to be rather than focusing on biological characteristics. Consequently, it's logical that males and females have different academic preferences and it's completely acceptable.
To conclude, colleges must consider approving the exact same figures among their male and female applicants in every subject. The essay, however, argued why this is extremely insignificant. In my opinion, this is not what we should really care about, instead, it's totally fine to expect variable figures when it comes to this matter.
Gender equality will always remain a controversial topic over subsequent generations.
Moreover
, it
is claimed
that universities
have to
approve the requests of equal numbers of
men
and women among its students in each matter of study.
However
, this essay will argue why this is
totally
unnecessary.
Despite
some
challenges, higher education institutions should accept the same proportion of male and
female
students in every subject.
Furthermore
, it
must
be a significant
rule
determined by the
governments
in each country to
make
sure that everyone
gets
a
fair
chance without any prejudice towards a specific gender.
For example
, in Japan, while a driving
class
has a significant number of girls, male participants of a dancing lesson constitute almost the same percentage as
females
.
Therefore
, colleges
must
consider sex equality when accepting their candidates.
On the contrary
, biological differences exist between
men
and women and this has a natural impact upon their choices.
In addition
, there is no harm in distributing
people
so
that they can land where they belong without imposing their decisions.
For instance
, in the USA, professors care more about helping their candidates to figure out
who
they
really
are and what they want to be
rather
than focusing on biological characteristics.
Consequently
, it's logical that
males
and
females
have
different
academic preferences and it's completely acceptable.
To conclude
, colleges
must
consider approving the exact same figures among their male and
female
applicants in every subject. The essay,
however
, argued why this is
extremely
insignificant. In my opinion, this is not what we should
really
care about,
instead
, it's
totally
fine to
expect
variable figures when it
comes
to this matter.