Universities should accept equal numbers of female and male students in every subjects. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that similar chances should be given to both genders to study in their favorable subjects at universities. I contend that this allegation is true because imposing restrictions will hamper individual’s development. However, I believe that it is premature to judge that the dissimilarity between genders in this specific case has no redeeming features.
On the one hand, it is true that enough freedom should be given to each person to pursue their ambitions. That is why when the acceptance of students at college for each subject is based on their aptitude and knowledge, seeds of hope are planted in their heart and therefore they have more inclination to flourish their unveiled skills. Under this circumstance, they make tremendous efforts to become a useful member of their societies. However, if the situation is against their expectation, these students will feel frustrated as realizing that they become a victim of gender discrimination and there is no way to fulfill their dreams.
On the other hand, it is fair to say that there is a myriad of contrasts between males and females by their nature, such as their abilities, characteristics, and so forth. For this reason, it is suggested that when it comes to accepting them for subjects at college some criteria should be set to make sure whether majors are suitable for them or not. Taking my home country as an example, decision makers have imposed quotas on subject called mechanical engineering for males, and nursing for females because their personalities are more adjustable with these subjects.
In conclusion, while it is valuable that educational institutes attempt to make a balance between the acceptance of men and women for subjects at universities, I tend dissimilarities between to genders should be taken into account simultaneously.
Universities should accept equal numbers of female and male students in every
subjects
. To what
extend
do you
agree
or disagree.
It
is argued
that similar chances should be
given
to both genders to study in their favorable
subjects
at universities. I contend that this allegation is true
because
imposing restrictions will hamper individual’s development.
However
, I believe that it is premature to judge that the dissimilarity between genders in this specific case has no redeeming features.
On the one hand, it is true that
enough
freedom should be
given
to each person to pursue their ambitions.
That is
why when the acceptance of students at college for each
subject
is based
on their aptitude and knowledge, seeds of hope
are planted
in their heart and
therefore
they have more inclination to flourish their unveiled
skills
. Under this circumstance, they
make
tremendous efforts to become a useful member of their societies.
However
, if the situation is against their expectation, these students will feel frustrated as realizing that they become a victim of gender discrimination and there is no way to fulfill their dreams.
On the other hand
, it is
fair
to say that there is a myriad of contrasts between males and females by their nature, such as their abilities, characteristics, and
so
forth.
For this reason
, it
is suggested
that when it
comes
to accepting them for
subjects
at college
some
criteria should
be set
to
make
sure whether majors are suitable for them or not. Taking my home country as an example, decision makers have imposed quotas on
subject
called mechanical engineering for males, and nursing for females
because
their personalities are more adjustable with these subjects.
In conclusion
, while it is valuable that educational institutes attempt to
make
a balance between the acceptance of
men
and women for
subjects
at universities, I tend dissimilarities between to genders should
be taken
into account
simultaneously
.