Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Undoubtedly, the government should make the priority tasks that should be carried out due to budget constraints

Undoubtedly, the government should make the priority tasks that should be carried out due to budget constraints XDj6r
Undoubtedly, the government should make the priority tasks that should be carried out due to budget constraints. A controversial question has been aroused people's minds whether the government devotes money to constructing new buildings or preserving old buildings? In response to this challenge, opinions are various from one person to another one, several experts advocate and others are opposite. As far as I am concerned it is better to safeguard historical buildings I will elaborate on my reason in the following paragraphs. To begin with, keeping ancient houses have several benefits that the first and the foremost of which increasing the level of welfare. It is dispensable fact that tourist industries are a thriving and interesting activity in the modern era. Every year, many more visitors view landmarks and natural perspectives across the world. As a result, they spend a lot of money not only on visiting ancient places but they purchase diverse handicrafts and pay money on entertainment activities. Consequently, it helps to improve the economic conditions of a country and It leads to reduce the unemployment issue, investing in maintaining the ancient buildings cause to introduce them as a tourist attraction. Hence this performance has no financial burden and the government can earn more money than it has spent. Apart away from tourist attractions, an aged house helps to educate the cultural heritage of country to the children. Admittedly this kind of buildings has a special architect that dated back to a given era. Several of them have Islamic style and others are European ones and use different material. As compared to theoretical material, student can easily compare these constructions with each other and easily identify differentiation Put in brief, according to above mentioned it can concluded that it is better to maintain ancient buildings due to the facts that it make money for government and have a educational base for children.
Undoubtedly
, the
government
should
make
the priority tasks that should
be carried
out due to budget constraints. A controversial question has
been aroused
people
's minds whether the
government
devotes
money
to constructing new
buildings
or preserving
old
buildings
? In response to this challenge, opinions are various from one person to another one, several experts advocate
and others
are opposite.
As
far as I
am concerned
it is better to safeguard historical
buildings
I will elaborate on my reason in the following paragraphs.

To
begin
with, keeping
ancient
houses
have several benefits that the
first
and
the foremost of
which increasing the level of welfare. It is dispensable fact that tourist industries are a thriving and interesting activity in the modern era. Every year,
many
more visitors view landmarks and natural perspectives across the world.
As a result
, they spend
a lot of
money
not
only
on visiting
ancient
places
but
they
purchase
diverse handicrafts and pay
money
on entertainment activities.
Consequently
, it
helps
to
improve
the economic conditions of a country and It leads to
reduce
the unemployment issue, investing in maintaining the
ancient
buildings
cause to introduce them as a tourist attraction.
Hence
this performance has no financial burden and the
government
can earn more
money
than it has spent.

Apart away from tourist attractions, an aged
house
helps
to educate the cultural heritage of country to the children.
Admittedly
this kind of
buildings
has a special architect that dated back to a
given
era. Several of them have Islamic style
and others
are European ones and
use
different
material. As compared to theoretical material, student can
easily
compare these constructions with each other and
easily
identify
differentiation


Put
in brief
, according to above mentioned it can
concluded
that it is better to maintain
ancient
buildings
due to the facts that it
make
money
for
government
and have
a
educational base for children.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Undoubtedly, the government should make the priority tasks that should be carried out due to budget constraints

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
314 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts