Undoubtedly, every teacher has an exclusive educational method. When it comes to teaching teenagers, opinions are various from one person to another one. Several experts suggest that lecturer only speak and student listen to him but other contradict the statement. As far as I am concerned, I think that the latter option is the better. I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs:
To begin with, students can improve learning efficiency via spending class time sharing ideas with classmates. Since they have various backgrounds and colorful experiences, allows them to look at ongoing matters via a different lens and angle view. Hence when they express their idea and defend it and giving others opportunities to criticize. they not only share experiences with other classmates but it also leads to completion of their own viewpoints and helps understand their own power and weakness. In addition, there is fierce competition among scholars to get a better score, if they feel weak when expressing an idea or defend it, they stimulate to study more and more information.
Besides, arguing with others leads to personal development. For expressing an idea on the ongoing issue, it is necessary that people should organize their thoughts and making support detail sequential with a short time in order to respond comment, it is obvious that such process help boost student brain. in addition, several undergraduates are very embarrassed to express ideas in front of the class. when they strive to make statements, they can be gradually familiar with what words they should use or how to make others actually understand. And, they ultimately enhance the verbal skill if they only take notes when teachers impart knowledge never would they opportunities to promote the ability in thinking and oral expression
Undoubtedly
, every teacher has an exclusive educational method. When it
comes
to teaching
teenagers
, opinions are various from one person to another one. Several experts suggest that lecturer
only
speak and student listen to him
but
other
contradict the statement. As far as I
am concerned
, I
think
that the latter option is the better. I will elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs:
To
begin
with, students can
improve
learning efficiency via spending
class
time sharing
ideas
with classmates. Since they have various backgrounds and colorful experiences,
allows
them to look at ongoing matters via a
different
lens and angle view.
Hence
when they express their
idea
and defend it and giving others opportunities to criticize.
they
not
only
share experiences with
other
classmates
but
it
also
leads to completion of their
own
viewpoints and
helps
understand their
own
power and weakness.
In addition
, there is fierce competition among scholars to
get
a better score, if they feel weak when expressing an
idea
or defend it, they stimulate to study more and more information.
Besides
, arguing with others leads to personal development. For expressing an
idea
on the ongoing issue, it is necessary that
people
should organize their thoughts and making support detail sequential with a short time in order to respond comment, it is obvious that such process
help
boost student brain.
in
addition, several undergraduates are
very
embarrassed to express
ideas
in front of the
class
.
when
they strive to
make
statements, they can be
gradually
familiar with what words they should
use
or how to
make
others actually understand. And, they
ultimately
enhance the verbal
skill
if they
only
take notes when teachers impart knowledge never would
they opportunities
to promote the ability in thinking and oral expression