Zoos are one of the common tourist attractions in almost all countries, because of the diversity in animal species seen across various countries. Some people are considering zoos as an option to keep the animals to showcase, while some others are against it. I strongly believe that animals should be allowed to live in their natural habitat and keeping them in zoos is a cruel act.
Many people believe that zoo is an attraction for many tourists. As many wild animals can be seen in zoos, people find it intersting to see them close. It is also an opportunity for people to see some rare species that can be seen only in that country. Zoo, as a tourist attraction would also bring revenue to the goverment.
While some are in favour of Zoos because of so many reasons, others are strongly against them. According to them, animals should be living in their natural habitat. Zoos cannot be considered as a natural enviroment for any wild animals, they are rather caged and forced to live in a restricted environment. This can be considered as a cruelty. Another point to add is, caging wild animals in Zoos can also lead to extriction if they are a species. Maintaining reserves for wild animals is the best option to avoid extinction which also bring an opportunity for the public to see them in their natural habitat.
both the views of having a zoo are valid. However, i strongly agree to the point that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. As there are effective methods to take care of and showcase them, goverment should be taking initiatives to implement those methods. I would prefer seeing the animals in a natural reserve than in a cage.
To conclude, animals should be allowed to live in their natural habitat considering the limitations and drawbacks of maintaining them in a restricted enviroment like zoos. From a tourism standpoint, proper management of reserves for wild animals is an alternative to zoos which brings revenue to the goverment.
Zoos are one of the common tourist attractions in almost all countries,
because
of the diversity in
animal
species
seen
across various countries.
Some
people
are considering zoos as an option to
keep
the
animals
to showcase, while
some
others are against it. I
strongly
believe that
animals
should be
allowed
to
live
in their
natural
habitat and keeping them in zoos is a cruel act.
Many
people
believe that zoo is an attraction for
many
tourists. As
many
wild
animals
can be
seen
in zoos,
people
find it
intersting
to
see
them close. It is
also
an opportunity for
people
to
see
some
rare species that can be
seen
only
in that country. Zoo, as a tourist attraction would
also
bring revenue to the
goverment
.
While
some
are in
favour
of Zoos
because
of
so
many
reasons, others are
strongly
against them. According to them,
animals
should be living in their
natural
habitat. Zoos cannot
be considered
as a
natural
enviroment
for any wild
animals
, they are
rather
caged and forced to
live
in a restricted environment. This can
be considered
as a cruelty. Another point to
add
is, caging wild
animals
in Zoos can
also
lead to
extriction
if they are a species. Maintaining reserves for wild
animals
is the best option to avoid extinction which
also
bring an opportunity for the public to
see
them in their
natural
habitat.
both
the views of having a zoo are valid.
However
,
i
strongly
agree
to the point that wild
animals
should not be
kept
in zoos. As there are effective methods to take care of and showcase them,
goverment
should be taking initiatives to implement those methods. I would prefer seeing the
animals
in a
natural
reserve than in a cage.
To conclude
,
animals
should be
allowed
to
live
in their
natural
habitat considering the limitations and drawbacks of maintaining them in a restricted
enviroment
like zoos. From a tourism standpoint, proper management of reserves for wild
animals
is an alternative to zoos which brings revenue to the
goverment
.