Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practise should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a famous maxim, "Always learn from past and make future better. Information about the past may help the jury in taking right decision. Some lawyers think that this practice should be supersede and it is necessary for the authorities to know about the past record of the lawbreaker. Thus, I partly agree with the statement and think that pointing out past record aggravate the problem of offender in future. On the one hand, past record of the offender helps the authority and provide useful information about him or her. In some cases, lawyer's try to hide the original facts about the felony. Ergo, evidences about the past wouldn't prevent the offender. For instance, some individual have feral behavior and often commits crime, written record of such person cajole the decision of judges. On the other hand, law enforcement agencies are made to take decision not for the past but only for the present. So, decision-making process must be depend on the crime scene. Sometimes, offender become a scapegoat, and punished for those crimes in which he/she involved by mistake. Due to this, main criminal go scot free. In conclusion, I think that decision making not only pivob around the past record. Pre-requisite must be the crime scene and current situation for law enforcement agencies.
There is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
maxim,
Use a smart opening quote here.
"
Always learn from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
future better. Information about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the jury in taking right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
decision
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
lawyers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that this practice should be
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
supersede and
it is necessary for the authorities to know about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
of the lawbreaker.
Thus
, I partly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the statement and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that pointing out
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
aggravate the problem of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
offender
The phrase ‘in future’ is British English. Did you mean: “in the future”?
in future
. On the one hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
offender
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
the authority and provide useful information about him or her. In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
cases, lawyer's try to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hide
the original facts about the felony. Ergo, evidences about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
wouldn't
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
offender
.
For instance
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
individual have feral behavior and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
commits
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
, written
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
of such person cajole the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
decision
of judges.

On the other hand
, law enforcement agencies

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter.
are
made to take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
decision
not for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
for the present.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, decision-making process
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be
Consider using the past participle “depended”.
depend
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
scene.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Sometimes
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
offender
become a scapegoat, and punished for those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crimes
in which he/she involved by mistake. Due to this, main criminal go
This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
scot free
.

In conclusion
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
decision making
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
Possible spelling mistake found.
pivob
around the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
record
.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Pre-requisite
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
crime
scene and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
situation for law enforcement agencies.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practise should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
216 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts