Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In most of the criminal cases, the trials are practiced in front of the jurors for a better judgement. This law is followed by both the British and Australian government; however, jurors possess no access to a defendant's past criminal facts. Onthe contrary few lawyers believe that the jurors should be provided with the adequate information, so they could pass a verdict judgement. Although, past events of a criminal is important to run a trail, in my opinion, I also presume that public people having access to such sensitive information might violates an individual's life. It is a universal fact that based on past events an individual can be judged better. Similarly, jurors learning the defendant's past criminal record aids them in passing a non-biased judgement. Though, only the present mistakes of a convict is brought to light; learning their past helps the jurors to understand a law-breaker's character, attitude, personality, and mental stability. Therefore, a thorough study assists a jury to understand their psychological state of a criminal's mind, and would be able to identify whether the person is a continuous offender or not. For instance, consider a thieving woman murdering her husband as part of self-defense; this type of case requires analyzing past criminal records of both the victim and the offender. On the other hand, jurors are the panel of common people selected randomly. Hence, providing access to past details of a defendant might lead to certain problems such as; lack of confidential when it is a high-profile criminal case, lose of privacy for the defendant, chances of spreading rumors and so on. Also, jurors are nominated for a present day trail; hence, knowledge of past events might hinder their judgement. To illustrate consider the previous example, a jury may believe that the woman committed the crime owing to the fact that of her reputation as a robber. To conclude, in my opinion, when jurors are summoned for a criminal case authorities should decide how much of a defendant's past details can be shared with the jurors for a non-partial, honest judgement.
In most of the
criminal
cases, the trials
are practiced
in front of the jurors for a better
judgement
. This law
is followed
by both the British and Australian
government
;
however
, jurors possess no access to a defendant's
past
criminal
facts.
Onthe
contrary few lawyers believe that the jurors should
be provided
with the adequate information,
so
they could pass a verdict
judgement
. Although,
past
events
of a
criminal
is
important
to run a trail, in my opinion, I
also
presume that public
people
having access to such sensitive information might
violates
an individual's life.

It is a universal fact that based on
past
events
an individual can
be judged
better.
Similarly
, jurors learning the defendant's
past
criminal
record aids them in passing a non-biased
judgement
. Though,
only
the present mistakes of a convict
is brought
to light; learning their
past
helps
the jurors to understand a law-breaker's character, attitude, personality, and mental stability.
Therefore
, a thorough study assists a jury to understand their psychological state of a criminal's mind, and would be able to identify whether the person is a continuous offender or not.
For instance
, consider a thieving woman murdering her husband as part of self-defense; this type of case requires analyzing
past
criminal
records of both the victim and the offender.

On the other hand
, jurors are the panel of common
people
selected
randomly
.
Hence
, providing access to
past
details
of a defendant might lead to certain problems such as; lack of confidential when it is a high-profile
criminal
case, lose of privacy for the defendant, chances of spreading rumors and
so
on.
Also
, jurors
are nominated
for a present day trail;
hence
, knowledge of
past
events
might hinder their
judgement
. To illustrate consider the previous example, a jury may believe that the woman committed the crime owing to the fact that of her reputation as a robber.

To conclude
, in my opinion, when jurors
are summoned
for a
criminal
case authorities should decide how much of a defendant's
past
details
can
be shared
with the jurors for a non-partial, honest
judgement
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
345 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts