There are two school of thoughts regarding environment issues. A few people think that there should be corrective actions at international level while others advocate that despite of dealing it at global level it is fortuitous to consider this problem at national levels. In my opinion, if we would be able to set up a mechanism worldwide in order to address the environment then we could get more better results rather than taking steps at specific country level.
First and foremost, the environmental problems like air pollution and global warming are becoming increasingly popular with the passage of time. We cannot blame to any particular nation for this atmospherically disorder. In fact, whole population in this globe is equally responsible for these difficulties. So, there should be a standard solution worldly to tackle with this problem. There are numerous benefits of implementing the corrective method globally e. g. effective utilization of green energy resources in spite of fossil fuels which not only strengthen the economy of any country but also reduce the air pollution. Furthermore, effective controlling of global warming will also aid in declining the diseases which are being cause from dirty environment. Similarly, a international campaign can be started to boost up the usage of hybrid vehicles which will be proved beneficial in reducing noise pollution as well.
While the others consider that to carry out a global action for environmental problems is not as easy task as anyone can think. It will involve a heavy amount of investment in order to maintain institutes that will ensure to apply this policy internationally. However, it would be much easier for any nation to outbreak some measures to control environment damage. For instance, they put ban over those vehicles which produce a huge smoke. Likewise, they can implement energy audit over industry which would be helpful to reduce industrial emissions into the environment. In sum, it would be convenient for all national if they set out a few corrective actions at country level.
In my opinion, it would be better to implement such efforts internationally rather than nationally due to some reasons. Firstly, rising environmental temperature has its effects in all over the world. For instance, the ice is melting and floods are coming harshly. So, if some measures are not taken internationally then the condition would become deteriorate with the passage of time. Although, taking steps at national is good but it can only be possible for developed countries. Under-developed countries mostly do not have capacity to spend some resources over environmental correction
In conclusion, taking corrective actions for environmental damage at global would be more beneficial than at national level. It is a global problem so its solution should also be at an international level.
There are two school of thoughts regarding
environment
issues. A few
people
think
that there should be
corrective
actions at international
level
while others advocate that
despite of
dealing it at
global
level
it is fortuitous to consider this
problem
at
national
levels
. In my opinion, if we would be able to set up a mechanism worldwide in order to address the
environment
then we could
get
more better
results
rather
than taking steps at specific
country
level.
First
and foremost, the
environmental
problems
like air pollution and
global
warming are becoming
increasingly
popular with the passage of time. We cannot blame to any particular nation for this
atmospherically
disorder. In fact, whole population in this globe is
equally
responsible for these difficulties.
So
, there should be a standard solution worldly to tackle with this
problem
. There are numerous benefits of implementing the
corrective
method globally
e. g.
effective utilization of green energy resources
in spite of
fossil fuels which not
only
strengthen the economy of any
country
but
also
reduce
the air pollution.
Furthermore
, effective controlling of
global
warming will
also
aid in declining the diseases which are being cause from dirty
environment
.
Similarly
,
a
international campaign can be
started
to boost up the usage of hybrid vehicles which will
be proved
beneficial in reducing noise pollution
as well
.
While the others consider that to carry out a
global
action
for
environmental
problems
is not as easy task as anyone can
think
. It will involve a heavy amount of investment in order to maintain institutes that will ensure to apply this policy
internationally
.
However
, it would be much easier for any nation to outbreak
some
measures to control
environment
damage.
For instance
, they put ban
over
those vehicles which produce a huge smoke.
Likewise
, they can implement energy audit
over
industry which would be helpful to
reduce
industrial emissions into the
environment
. In sum, it would be convenient for all
national
if they set out a few
corrective
actions at
country
level.
In my opinion, it would be better to implement such efforts
internationally
rather
than
nationally
due to
some
reasons.
Firstly
, rising
environmental
temperature has its effects in all
over
the world.
For instance
, the ice is melting and floods are coming
harshly
.
So, if
some
measures are not taken
internationally
then the condition would become deteriorate with the passage of time. Although, taking steps at
national
is
good
but
it can
only
be possible for developed
countries
. Under-developed
countries
mostly
do not have capacity to spend
some
resources
over
environmental
correction
In conclusion
, taking
corrective
actions for
environmental
damage at
global
would be more beneficial than at
national
level
. It is a
global
problem
so
its solution should
also
be at an international
level
.