It is acknowledged that tourism is an essential sector in engendering most of the profit for several regions in the world. However, if the administration is unable to properly handle the tourist influx, discouraging effects can ensue. This essay will argue that the advantages of tourism outweigh the drawbacks by first demonstrating that it is a harbinger of the economic and cross-cultural augmentation of a country. This will be followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely the environmental abuse, is not valid.
The main reason to spur tourists into travelling is that the generated cash influx accounts for a significant proportion of private and national incomes. To put it differently, this wealth generation entails employment opportunities for thousands of native people who have considerably improved their livelihood. For instance, The New York Times recently reported that the quality of life in Tibet and Nepal has improved greatly over the last 20 years.
The promotion of local features fuels geographical identity worldwide and allows people to acquire awareness about fascinating cultures and traditions. In other words, enticing people to travel endorses oneness among people, which can have a long-lasting impact socially. A survey by Cambridge University found that those who journey frequently were more likely to spend time on charity works once back home.
Those opposed say that the high influx of tourists can lead to immense environmental destruction, especially in destinations where tourists are more prone to visit. However, there is actually no reason to support this view since tourism is reported to provide economic incentives for a place to preserve, maintain, and regenerate the environment in both urban and rural settings. Indeed, ecotourism might promote environmental awareness and activism.
It
is acknowledged
that tourism is an essential sector in engendering most of the profit for several regions in the world.
However
, if the administration is unable to
properly
handle the
tourist
influx, discouraging effects can ensue. This essay will argue that the advantages of tourism outweigh the drawbacks by
first
demonstrating that it is a harbinger of the economic and cross-cultural augmentation of a country. This will
be followed
by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage,
namely
the environmental abuse, is not valid.
The main reason to spur
tourists
into travelling is that the generated cash influx accounts for a significant proportion of private and national incomes. To put it
differently
, this wealth generation entails employment opportunities for thousands of native
people
who have
considerably
improved
their livelihood.
For instance
, The New York Times recently reported that the quality of life in Tibet and Nepal has
improved
greatly
over the last 20 years.
The promotion of local features fuels geographical identity worldwide and
allows
people
to acquire awareness about fascinating cultures and traditions.
In other words
, enticing
people
to travel endorses oneness among
people
, which can have a long-lasting impact
socially
. A survey by Cambridge University found that those who journey
frequently
were more likely to spend time on charity works once back home.
Those opposed say that the high influx of
tourists
can lead to immense environmental destruction,
especially
in destinations where
tourists
are more prone to visit.
However
, there is actually no reason to support this view since tourism
is reported
to provide economic incentives for a place to preserve, maintain, and regenerate the environment in both urban and rural settings.
Indeed
, ecotourism might promote environmental awareness and activism.