When it comes to gun ownership, many nations have been pretty flexible. To some extent, I agree that there are some undeniable benefits of owning firearms. However, I firmly believe that its drawbacks outweigh the benefits, and therefore, possessing guns should be prohibited.
There are various reasons why people nowadays believe that carrying such a weapon would present them with a better life. Firstly, there are certain circumstances when citizens cannot defend themselves against threats such as being under attack by dangerous criminals or being lost in the jungle that is full of wild animals. Those are the time when they are all alone and need to stick up for themselves, and by having a firearm by their side, it will make them feel safer. Secondly, if access to guns is forbidden, individuals' right to enjoy activities such as hunting or firearms collecting would be violated.
On the other hand, I believe that providing people with access to use gun could potentially lead to undesirable consequences. The first reason is that the existence of firearms in the house might threaten the safety of family members. For instance, a child might think the gun is a piece of toy, and unintentionally shot herself. Another reason is that although advocates of gun ownership contend that firearms could be used effectively in legitimate defence situations, the government has underestimated the danger when those weapons are given to the hands of criminals or even worse – terrorists. Up until September 2019, in the USA alone, a whopping 334 mass shootings have occurred, causing hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries for many innocent citizens, reminding us once again about the negative outcome of gun ownership.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of carrying a gun in each society, I would argue that the detrimental effects of it should not be neglected, and the authorities should ban gun usage for ordinary people.
When it
comes
to
gun
ownership,
many
nations have been pretty flexible. To
some
extent, I
agree
that there are
some
undeniable benefits of owning
firearms
.
However
, I
firmly
believe that its drawbacks outweigh the benefits, and
therefore
, possessing
guns
should
be prohibited
.
There are various reasons why
people
nowadays believe that carrying such a weapon would present them with a better life.
Firstly
, there are certain circumstances when citizens cannot defend themselves against threats such as being under attack by
dangerous
criminals or
being lost
in the jungle
that is
full of wild animals. Those are the time when they are all alone and need to stick up for themselves, and by having a
firearm
by their side, it will
make
them feel safer.
Secondly
, if access to
guns
is forbidden
, individuals' right to enjoy activities such as hunting or
firearms
collecting would
be violated
.
On the other hand
, I believe that providing
people
with access to
use
gun
could
potentially
lead to undesirable consequences. The
first
reason is that the existence of
firearms
in the
house
might threaten the safety of family members.
For instance
, a child might
think
the
gun
is a piece of toy, and
unintentionally
shot herself. Another reason is that although advocates of
gun
ownership contend that
firearms
could be
used
effectively
in legitimate
defence
situations, the
government
has underestimated the
danger
when those weapons are
given
to the hands of criminals or even worse
–
terrorists. Up until September 2019, in the USA alone, a whopping 334 mass shootings have occurred, causing hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries for
many
innocent citizens, reminding us once again about the
negative
outcome of
gun
ownership.
In conclusion
, despite the advantages of carrying a
gun
in each society, I would argue that the detrimental effects of it should not
be neglected
, and the authorities should ban
gun
usage for ordinary
people
.