That getting information from many different resources plays an absolute significant role in spread spectrum of a modern person’s life is an undeniable fact. Should people realize the advantages of using different news resources in today’s complicated world they will ponder over it much more scrupulously. This issue has recently been the topic of debate among sociologists. In the existence of all points of view, I do believe that the two paramount objectives of getting news from many different resources are being aware of the all international issues and finding reliable resources. Seeing different points of view about a single event can be noted as another rationale.
To begin with, it is incontrovertibly axiomatic that checking different news resources results in being aware of the all international issues. In other words if we only check just one news channel or website, we might lose an important event. For example during the last summer, the Olympic games were held in Brazil, and because I am a big fan of swimming competitions, I had to check different sources to get access to news about the winners of gold medals.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that nowadays finding reliable news resources is really hard. That is to say, most people believe that some news agencies are not independent and trusting them is a big mistake. To elucidate, once I was looking for the number of victims of AIDS in Africa and surprisingly I understood that some websites tend to hide the true number of victims. Therefore on no account can underrate efficacy of checking numerous sources with regards to finding a trust-able resource.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by the following discussion. Sometimes we need to see an event from different aspects and if we limit ourselves to a few resources, we may neglect other aspects which might be important. It’s like seeing the bright sight of the moon and forgetting about the dark side. For example when a new dam had been constructed in our state, most of the news resources were talking about the benefits of this dam for local agriculture and nobody was mentioning the damages caused by construction process to traditional inhabitants of the river like fishes and frogs.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments to the consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Inasmuch as getting up-to-date, reliable and comprehensive news has profound effects on the complexity of our point of view about an event, underestimating the significance of checking different news sources in not logical.
That getting information from
many
different
resources plays an absolute significant role in spread spectrum of a modern person’s life is an undeniable fact. Should
people
realize the advantages of using
different
news
resources in
today
’s complicated world they will ponder over it much more
scrupulously
. This
issue
has recently been the topic of debate among sociologists. In the existence of all
points
of
view
, I do believe that the two paramount objectives of getting
news
from
many
different
resources are being aware of the all international
issues
and finding reliable resources. Seeing
different
points
of
view
about a single
event
can
be noted
as another rationale.
To
begin
with, it is
incontrovertibly
axiomatic that checking
different
news
resources results in being aware of the all international
issues
.
In other words
if we
only
check
just
one
news
channel or website, we might lose an
important
event
.
For example
during the last summer, the
Olympic games
were held
in Brazil, and
because
I am a
big
fan of swimming competitions, I had to
check
different
sources to
get
access to
news
about the winners of gold medals.
The second reason why I advocate this
point
of
view
lies in the fact that nowadays finding reliable
news
resources is
really
hard
.
That is
to say, most
people
believe that
some
news
agencies are not independent and trusting them is a
big
mistake. To elucidate, once I was looking for the number of victims of AIDS in Africa and
surprisingly
I understood that
some
websites tend to
hide
the true number of victims.
Therefore
on no account can underrate efficacy of checking numerous sources
with regards to
finding a trust-able resource.
Having discussed this
issue
from this
point
of
view
, I am going to empower it by the following discussion.
Sometimes
we need to
see
an
event
from
different
aspects and if we limit ourselves to a few resources, we may neglect other aspects which might be
important
. It’s like seeing the bright sight of the moon and forgetting about the dark side.
For example
when a
new
dam had
been constructed
in our state, most of the
news
resources were talking about the benefits of this dam for local agriculture and nobody was mentioning the damages caused by construction process to traditional inhabitants of the river like fishes and frogs.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments to the consideration, the following conclusion can
be drawn
about the
issue
. Inasmuch as getting up-to-date, reliable and comprehensive
news
has profound effects on the complexity of our
point
of
view
about an
event
, underestimating the significance of checking
different
news
sources in not logical.