The reading states that people are reading less literature than they used to, so this trend has some negative effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and then it provides three reasons of support. Meanwhile, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She clearly believes that none of these reasons are practical for the issue and refutes all of them.
To begin with, the reading declares that nothing can provide the intellectual stimulation that literature does. The lecturer, however, disagrees and asserts that for encouraging the imagination, there is no need to study literature. That is to say, other forms of the writings like science, political analysis can also stimulate the imagination.
Second, although the reading passage claims that the level of the culture will be lowered by watching the trivial forms than reading literature, the lecturer makes the argument that there are plenty of other materials like music and movies that can benefit people. She states that the culture has changed to other forms and in some cases they may have more cultural influences than the books have.
Third, in contrast to the reading passage statement claiming that the standards and the audience have been affected in a negative trend because of not having good literature, the lecturer refutes and then states that it is the author' s fault. She believes that authors tend to write complex contents, and thus readers cannot understand their works appropriately.
The
reading
states that
people
are
reading
less
literature
than they
used
to,
so
this trend has
some
negative
effects for the
reading
public, for culture
in general
, and then it provides three reasons of support. Meanwhile, the
lecturer
casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting
some
counter-arguments and examples. She
clearly
believes that none of these reasons are practical for the issue and refutes all of them.
To
begin
with, the
reading
declares that nothing can provide the intellectual stimulation that
literature
does. The
lecturer
,
however
, disagrees and asserts that for encouraging the imagination, there is no need to study
literature
.
That is
to say, other forms of the writings like science, political analysis can
also
stimulate the imagination.
Second, although the
reading
passage claims that the level of the culture will
be lowered
by watching the trivial forms than
reading
literature
, the
lecturer
makes
the argument that there are
plenty
of other materials like music and movies that can benefit
people
. She states that the culture has
changed
to other forms and in
some
cases they may have more cultural influences than the books have.
Third,
in contrast
to the
reading
passage statement claiming that the standards and the audience have been
affected
in a
negative
trend
because
of not having
good
literature
, the
lecturer
refutes and then states that it is the
author&
#039; s fault. She believes that authors tend to write complex contents, and
thus
readers cannot understand their works
appropriately
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
16Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes